HUAYRA wrote:
INTERESTING
I SEE WHAT YOU MEAN
I DO SEE A GLARING CONTRADICTION THOUGH
THE INTENT OF COLLECTIVE VS INDIVIDUAL DOESN'T MATTER
ITS STILL TALK OF META
FROM 'NOT CARING' TO 'I KNOW WHO YOU ARE AND ILL USE IT IN A POINT' IS CONTRADICTORY
MY VOTE WILL STAND
Yes, you can call it meta if you like. It is hardly a contradiction. I'm not wasting any time discussing who he might be, I was pointing out that there are certain indications from the playstyle as to who he is, and that is why I chose to say what I did to him. If my guess is wrong, then it doesn't matter, but if it is right then it would hopefully help not antagonise a stubborn player into voting for me regardless of the situation from now until the end of time itself.
You asked what I disagree with you on now... well this:
Quote:
ALSO
J1N KEEPS SAYING HE WASNT DISMISSIVE OF OVERALL DISCUSSION
I GROW WEARY OF THIS BROKEN RECORD RESPONSE
NOBODY SAID YOU WERE BEING DISMISSIVE OVERALL
WE GET IT
YOU GET IT
YOU WERE HOWEVER BEING DISMISSIVE OF THE ONLY DISCUSSION GOING ON AT THE TIME
INSTEAD OF FORGING YOUR OWN PATH OF DISCUSSION YOU CONTRIBUTED NOTHING BUT AN EMPTY VOTE AND SAID WE WERE ALL WASTING OUR TIME
THAT IS WHAT WE ARE SAYING
NOT THAT YOU WERE PUTTING A HALT ON ALL DISCUSSION
THAT YOU WERE HALTING THE CURRENT DISCUSSION AND NOT TRYING TO DISCUSS ANYTHING YOURSELF
If you all get it, why are you all still going on at me about it? I fully stand by my dismissive attitude towards that discussion, but I shouldn't have to be the only one able to provide an alternative. At the time, I didn't have one. I just knew that we were onto a dead end.
Now I've tried to provoke a discussion - Mecha's poor reasoning for voting. Which I shall return to in a moment, after clarifying the other point you mentioned.
Agreeing with you 'somewhat' is because I am not going to say that I agree with every single thing you say wholeheartedly. I am not a sheep, I merely respected the two valid points you have made so far.
@Lara, since you requested a response.
MECHA wrote:
Well since no one voted for Nonagon, I guess we're back to voting at people who irk us. (or are inactive)
Yesterday had four votes for J1N at one point, so that's my best guess for a lynch if we get one.
You want to know why continuing a vote train is suspicious, given the little info we received overnight, it isn't.
However Mecha didn't vote for me D2. He was not part of the train, he did not just stick to voting for the same person. He voted for me first today for the reason quoted above, and it is up to you whether you feel that his reasoning is solid.
For my part, I don't think it is. Voting for the person most likely to have been lynched the day before, without bothering to make ANY analysis on what actually happened during the day (other than the vote count) or adding ANY sort of actual opinion... it just seems rather scummy.
Added to this, the fact that the only reasoning for voting given was "people who irk us", he then explained his vote for me not because I "irk" him, but because I am the easiest target. Essentially, that is exactly what a mafia would do. Go for the easiest target, get in there early, watch as everyone else falls for it and the mafia gets a free kill.
Think that addresses everything needed for now. My vote remains on Mecha.