MECHA wrote:
Well since no one voted for Nonagon, I guess we're back to voting at people who irk us. (or are inactive)
Yesterday had four votes for J1N at one point, so that's my best guess for a lynch if we get one.
That is no real reason to vote. What you are really doing is picking someone you know is likely to receive votes, and getting in there early so you don't get accused of jumping on a train later.
Mecha.
DELTA SQUAD wrote:
I voted for J1N yesterday and i'm doing so again now. this was just the nail in the coffin. you didn't vote because you were in a rush? you didn't vote because you didn't know who you were actually voting for?
a villager wouldn't do that. a villager would know that making a half-assed post is only going to get them under suspicioun, and that they would be better off making a well thought out post that touches on all of the topics and then follows through with a vote than make a crappy fast post that will get torn to pieces.
a mafioso wouldn't do that either, however. they would also be aware that their main goal is to stay under the radar, and making posts "in a rush" is not going to help their cause any.
so what i deduce from this is that you're lying. you didn't vote not because you were in a rush, but because you had no intention of placing that vote in the first place. when you were called on it you used the classic "too busy (it was probably schoolwork, even)" excuse. to even try admitting that you forgot the name of the person you wanted to vote for (aka you're not paying attention to the game) is even worse but its in the same ballpark.
J1N
So you say that what I did was not something a villager would do. But also not something a mafia would do. Nice contradiction. Then you accuse me of lying? Well I wasn't, and don't appreciate being called a liar.
I was in a rush, I was going out, and you have no right to dismiss my reasoning if you are going to call me up for the same thing. I defy you to tell me the name of every person in this game without checking any list. It was early D2 and the post could have been by anyone. That is the one thing I will agree with Huayra on - at least his/her posting style is distinctive.
If I was a mafia I would not have even bothered posting a response in the first place. I would have kept quiet, lurked like Gamma, or tried sheeping a vote on and hoping nobody picked me up for it.
KID wrote:
J1N wrote:
KID wrote:
I think both Eximus and J1N are exhibiting scum tells, J1N moreso however with an obstructionist approach. Being dismissive of discussion raises alarm bells for me.
Would love to hear what you think scum tells are.
I wasn't dismissing of discussion. I was dismissing of wasting the bloody day discussing the difference between Vote #2 and Vote #3 on a person who could be any role in the game at that point, since there is zero information otherwise, so therefore who voted second or third means absolutely nothing AT THAT POINT. If they vote for someone and that person dies, THEN it is a discussion worth having.
Also, to be quite frank, my vote will stand as I cannot be bothered to have any form of discussion with someone who thinks it is amusing to type entirely in capitals when there is no reason for it. It should be used for EMPHASIS, so people can actually see what his/her point is clearly. My opinion is that they are doing it to throw off any suspicion of being a mafia in the early game, as I highly doubt someone would continue that until late-game.
Not buying that defence, discussion is what generates information to vote on and nothing was being discussed at all at that point, so some information is better than none. Like I said it's obstructionist,
J1NSo you refuse to answer my query regarding your opinion on scum tells?
Do you HONESTLY think that spending a day discussing whether vote #2 or #3 is more scummy BEFORE a lynch takes place is actually beneficial? Answer me that. Day 2 is the time to discuss other matters, the order of votes is a discussion to be had AFTER a lynch, or AFTER a death of someone people had been voting for. It isn't a defence, it is my opinion. The worst thing about this is that my opinion has now wasted almost of day of other people voting for me as a result. The best thing is that it has generated enough discussion for me to make my mind up about some people.
Mecha is where my vote remains, as someone I feel is a mafia for the aforementioned reasons.
KID, I feel that you are just a misguided villager, and I would rather not get into a long debate with you which ends in the lynch of one of us, then the other one as a result of that, and also a waste of a large percentage of both of our times. If this does happen, at least pay attention to those voting around you please.
Delta... contradictions, overly aggressive behaviour, and an attitude which is giving me bad vibes. From your writing style, I think I can guess who you are, and if that is true then you are someone who will make their mind up and refuse to change it out of pure stubbornness, even if you are completely wrong. Without wishing to antagonise you, you ARE wrong.
