Glodenox wrote:
The way the chat is built, the colours of people are stored on the server and sent along with each message they send out. Therefore the userlist has no clue which colour a particular person has. We could however expand the information codes that get sent when a user joins the chat so that it includes the colour of the user, which would solve that issue.
That would be great.
Glodenox wrote:
Perhaps just the colours we get on the forums? (aka: blue) I'm perfectly able to send which colour a user has at the authentication at the forum, so it would be a possibility.
Anything but brown.
Glodenox wrote:
I was actually trying that out yesterday. Sadly enough the chat client is currently built up from AWT components - the old Java User Interface system. I'm planning on transforming the whole layout to Swing - the new Java UI system, which will make it possible to easily add such images (it's also possible in AWT, but I'm not too fond about modifying the paint() procedure. Anyway, I currently don't have the time for that, but I'll look into it when I do.
Sounds good.
Glodenox wrote:
Having another font behind the name isn't exactly an easy thing to do right now (quite easy to do with Swing, I'd just use HTML). Nothing is impossible, but it'll take some time to get such a thing working properly.
Having more commands isn't overly complicated, we would have to add extra options on the server and on the client. But I wonder: is it of any use to have those other commands once Away is written out in full? Also, what is the purpose of giving yourself the Dead status? Its use eludes me...
Dead status is just for fun. It means you're dead.
Away differs from BRB and Busy, especially Busy. Someone may not be away, but they may be busy.
Glodenox wrote:
I personally hate the bell because I've hardly seen *anyone* use it the way it was intended to be used. I'm even pretty certain that if I'd go over all bell messages, I would find out that no more than 3% of the bells were actually meant to notify people of something they've said. Nonetheless, it seems to have gotten popular, so I'm willing to have a stab at it after my exams (so in at least 3 weeks). In theory we should be able to load them somewhat the same way as we handle emoticons at the moment (so in an archive on the server).
Good thing we'll have the option to turn off the bell sound!
I completely understand why you hate the bell, but a lot of us really really like it.
Glodenox wrote:
Enable/Disable bell: that'll be there for certain if I get the bell going, Bolds & Italics: not impossible, but would need so many changes that I simply refuse to spend my time on it. Also, now that we finally have a clean chat window, I'm not really inclined to let it get cluttered again.
Ah, that sucks, I thought it would be an easy change.
Glodenox wrote:
Flashchat doesn't actually even open a window, it's out of reach for Flash to open a window. If the PM windows are stored somewhere I can access it from the user list though, I'm willing to have a stab at putting a small button next to usernames with who you're having a conversation. Messages would still minimize to the task bar, but clicking that button in the userlist would then bring up that window again.
A few people have posted responses to this while I've been writing out my post. Still not sure if it's 100% possible, but it sounds like it might be (or I could have misunderstood something).
Glodenox wrote:
Don't you think that would look cluttered? In my opinion, the pros don't outweigh the time I'd have to put into that.
Not really, it's a feature we have in flashchat and it doesn't look too cluttered right now. It's not absolutely necessary, but it would be nice.
Glodenox wrote:
Hmm, that would be quite advanced. It would also force people to use the /join command to join a room (unless we provide a right-click option on the category and people actually manage to find that OR if we provide a small button, a plus sign or so, on the category title). Also, it will never look the way you are presenting it now. At minimum I'd be able to display the categories, but there won't be any spacing underneath the list of users of one room and the title of the next room. If there are more than x people in the chat, scrollbars have to appear in the userlist and therefore we'd be wasting space the way you currently propose it in the mock-up.
It's only one line of space per category, maybe you can increase the overall height of the chatroom to make up for that lost space.
Mackerel wrote:
What's the point of coloured usernames? I don't see the purpose. An active mod/admin will speak if spoken too. That's why it's possible to beep them. I like the simple one coloured userlist with mods in bold. People with the power could be recognised quickly. Why do people need to know who a Board Mod is if they aren't speaking? Chances are if they are active they will respond to a forum PM just as quickly.
TBH the main reason why I want that change is because the userlist looks really boring, it could use some color. Plus it's always convenient to know exactly which users are mods/admins, especially for newer users.
Mackerel wrote:
I wouldn't use up the green rank, there may be room to use the forum mod rank again in the future. The pink colour isn't an admin colour, it's only a mod colour with the extra ability to mute a chat mod. This would require more coding which I think for the time being should be saved to actually getting the chat into working order. I like the brown, it's a more boring and serious colour than red, pink, white or green. Besides brown is nostilagic.
I don't like boring and serious.
Pink should be available, there's no need for two types of chatmods (those that can mute and those that can't... they should all be able to mute
).
How much more coding would be needed? It's just a matter of changing the admin name color.
Mackerel wrote:
The smiley list we used to have worked reasonable. It was similar to what the current chat has but it was broken up into sections... I forget what they actually were but for example there were sections such as: plain smileys, extra smileys and admin smileys. Your idea looks like something that resembles that
Yeah but that smiley list didn't show the actual smiley images in the list, did it?
Mackerel wrote:
Most of the users that use flash chat actually migrated from the meepchat anyway so this won't be a problem. You may not remember how the away chat worked but if you typed "/away Gone to the shops, back in 5 mins
" this would appear if you clicked on the users name so it is actually incredibly more informative than the flash chats brb, dead and busy functions. Surely the big A next to their name is enough to distinguish if a user is away? I think it is more something people will get used to in a week and is actually better than the current system anyway..
I know, but some of us have gotten used to the new features in flashchat and that should not be ignored just because the similar javachat features are
good enough. Also, away means that you're AFK for a long period of time, BRB means you'll be back in a few mins, and busy means that you're at you're computer, but not able to spend a lot of time chatting. It's nice to have more status options.
How is (A) better than (Away), (BRB), (Busy)? Users who are not familiar with javachat will have no idea what it means, and we can't expect them to click it to figure out what it means. I guess after a while everyone would get used to it, but when I enter a chatroom I like to know what's going on, I don't want it to take me a few days to figure everything out.
Dead is a status born from the mafia chatroom. It's basically just there for fun.
Mackerel wrote:
Why do you need a bell button? You can beep users or PM them. The PM actually brings up a new window so even if they have their sound or beeps set to off you can still get their attention.
Ringing the bell is just one of those fun little things to do in chat. It's different from beeping or PMing a user because you're not always trying to get a person's attention with a bell.
Sometimes we like to see how many times we can ring the bell before someone breaks the combo.
A lot of us like the bell, but users who don't like it can easily turn it off.
Mackerel wrote:
I dislike the idea of bold or italic text, is it really needed? Unless you have future plans to force people using sarcasm to speak in italics or something...?
No, I don't plan to force anyone to use bold or italics.
Some people like having bold text, some people (like me) like using bold/italics to emphasize a word or phrase.
Mackerel wrote:
I see the flash chats version of PMs and containing them to the one window as a disadvantage. I can see your opposition to it though. Maybe somewhere down the track this could be an option that users could choose to turn on/off at their leisure? I don't think removing it all together would be best as I find it quite useful at times.
How is it a disadvantage? It saves taskbar space.
Mackerel wrote:
I really didn't like this feature which is why I decided not to use it. Besides, wasn't it's main purpose to make it possible for people to differentiate who is a chat mod and who isn't? Bold does that in meepchat.
What feature are you referring to?
Mackerel wrote:
The spam room suggestion could work and is quite a good idea, but again, can't it wait until the chat is live and running?
I guess, but I don't see why it can't be done now, unless it's something really difficult.
Mackerel wrote:
I think that a good start would be if fant (and glod) could get something up and running that had the same functionality as the old meepchat. Once this was achieved I'm sure all these other ideas could be debated and put into some kind of order.
That's basically where they're at right now. MeepBot still needs a bit of work, but I'm pretty sure everything else is up to speed.
Mackerel wrote:
Before any of the superficial things you mentioned I think it would be within the moderators interests to develop a better IP tracking system. The old system with typing /query and then having to log into the mod control panel, finding the right tab and manually typing in the IP addresses to find a match was a pain. Then having to try several more searches to find a wildcard match.. The old ban page was also a pain. It was extremely hard to use as it wasn't put into pages but all dumped onto the one page. This put stress on my internet connection and my browser. This was further complicated when people would ban certain things and also bbcode. Such as being able to ban an image and have it appear in the chat ban log... This then went ahead and stretched parts of the database
We have a pretty nifty IP-check command in flashchat, /whois. It displays this information:
User=Jackstick room=RV Chat created=08:58 lang=en tz=360 ip=<removed> host=<removed>Mackerel wrote:
The mod cp definately needs to come with improved functionality this time around
No arguments here. I don't know anything about the javachat mod cp because I wasn't a mod in those days.