Mafia 15 - A Party Game - Day 8

Riptide · **Posted:** August 6th, 2010, 2:55 pm

I've been proven a neutral role. :?:

And did you read my previous post, you noob?

Topsummoner · **Posted:** August 6th, 2010, 2:55 pm

Well I don't know what to say if you won't believe that I've never played Mafia IRL. What do you expect me to say otherwise to defend myself from your accusations?

@ Riptide

Wrong game stupid.

Riptide · **Posted:** August 6th, 2010, 3:01 pm

Olol, yeah. -.-

Riptide · **Posted:** August 6th, 2010, 3:03 pm

EDIT: How is this wrong game???

Riptide wrote:

Monk Basher wrote:

I'm going with Riptide for tacitly going along with mentos's silencing claim. Who would do this? He wasn't silenced.

Riptide wrote:

Guys, here's what really goes on. Mentos is a lying little- Ugh..... Look, for some odd reason, things in the Rp and Lit Society don't appear on the View Active Topcs thing, so I finally got fed up enough to click the forum link. But it was too late. Already N1. Aaaannyways, I've never had that stupid FB convo with him. I don't even know he has one. Soooo.....>Vote here< He's most likely not a jester. He is mafia thinking that we'll think of him as jester, but that was made too obvious.

Lolz

Steely Mallon · **Posted:** August 6th, 2010, 3:22 pm

...Because nowhere in this game have you been proven to have a neutral role?

Riptide · **Posted:** August 6th, 2010, 3:27 pm

Oh, yeah... I was thinking Upick.... I fail....

Sighence · **Posted:** August 6th, 2010, 5:08 pm

Doubly so since you fail to address the issue of your role PM. That's now been abundantly clear, no question.

Scar · **Posted:** August 6th, 2010, 5:17 pm

Monk Basher wrote:

Still doesn't answer why he didn't post, Scar. Iunno about you, but my role PM came a whopping two minutes after the topic was opened. Rip knew full well what he was doing. But enough of that dead horse.

That's when I received mine as well, Riptide wouldn't have gotten his when we did though since he was a replacement. Look, if there was any real evidence against him I wouldn't hesitate to vote for him. But this entire argument is based on Riptide not checking the topic D1 and a lie the jester used to get lynched, and that doesn't seem to be reason enough to lynch him.

Monk Basher wrote:

Why have you been so adamant in defending him? Why hasn't he answered these allegations himself? Answer: Because you mafia are afraid he'll mess up, so you're doing it for him.

Because I think he is Town aligned and killing villagers is counter productive to winning the game the last time I checked.

Riptide · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 6:41 am

You know what, this is gonna seem like an OMGUS vote, but Monk, why the hell are you pushing so hard to get me lynched?

Sighence · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 8:57 am

Riptide wrote:

You know what, this is gonna seem like an OMGUS vote, but Monk, why the hell are you pushing so hard to get me lynched?

Because I'm mafia and think you're an easy target. :roll:

You know why. It *is* an OMGUS vote.

Landerpurex · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 10:53 am

Dr Henry wrote:

Lander you say that doing that would have put you in the spotlight, which as mafia is where you wouldn't want to be. Well, as a mafia wouldn't that be the perfect defence as to saying you are a villager instead? Besides, I'm fairly certain the common belief is that inactives are scum, and those who are active or in the spotlight are villagers. You know this, so using it as a ploy to be a mafia in the spotlight is an easy thing for you to do.

Wrong. A good mafioso will find the middle ground, being active while staying away from situations that will cause them to be closely scrutinized. That being said, I meant I wouldn't pull the stunt because it would bring undue attention to me. I never said I'd be inactive.

BZZZZZZZZZZZZ wrote:

Herny: First of all, to sum up the last mafia game (don't get why lander or kik couldn't do it themselves), lander played well over half the game as the only mafia alive (3, 4 days?). Made it down the final three players. That said, he ran out of gas for being a mafioso. After the game said that if he's mafia again soon he won't be putting in that enormous effort again, or anything close. For him to be mafia this game, he would in fact have to be putting in that effort. That's where Kik is drawing his point from.

We didn't do it because if Doc finds it relevant (which he likely doesn't, apparently) he can look it up. But kikori is right in the respect that if he's going to try and tear down one of my points without actually *knowing* what it is, then he's playing poorly.

Monk Basher wrote:

Riptide wrote:

You know what, this is gonna seem like an OMGUS vote, but Monk, why the hell are you pushing so hard to get me lynched?

Because I'm mafia and think you're an easy target. :roll:

You know why. It *is* an OMGUS vote.

I'd argue that it's probably one of the most well-founded votes he's placed. :?:

That stuff being said, it seems that both Doc and Monk are playing strangely for being veterans. Doc keeps pushing to lynch me, he says I'm scum but has no reasons other than a gut instinct and a speculation that kikori and I are making up the whole recruitment thing to assume ourselves as townies. Key words here are gut instinct and speculation. He has no solid evidence, and although I've asked for something more several times, I haven't gotten it. :?:

Monk, on the same token, is doing something similar in that he's voting for Riptide based on a speculation that he's lying about not being able to check the topic. But he ought to know that a train on Riptide can take off at any given moment. (Although the fact that it hasn't might point to the fact that Riptide *may* be scum, but I think it's more that most people find Monk's reason/s bogus.) Riptide hasn't even said or done anything scummy this game (yet) and like I said. He is at least semi active when he's able.

I'm not quite following the logic behind the bluecoat train.

Landerpurex · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 10:57 am

Also, I'm fully aware that Monk has said that he has a role. That certainly does not rule him out as a suspect, if anything; it makes him more suspicious because he's said "I have a role lol but I'm not telling what." In my experience, you don't claim unless you have to and if you have to, you don't half-ass it. It's all or nothing.

Sighence · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 11:14 am

Fine, you wanna know what it is? I roleblock. You'll be able to confirm that tomorrow.

Landerpurex · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 11:16 am

Monk Basher wrote:

Fine, you wanna know what it is? I roleblock. You'll be able to confirm that tomorrow.

Orly?

Sighence · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 11:17 am

Well unless you don't have a night role.

Either way, you're not doing anything tonight. :weird:

Landerpurex · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 11:20 am

Monk Basher wrote:

Well unless you don't have a night role.

Either way, you're not doing anything tonight. :weird:

'kay.

Sighence · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 11:29 am

Also, Top and DC, what have your nightly activities been?

I know some of them ( :weird:

), but not all. I think we should now.

Landerpurex · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 11:32 am

Monk Basher wrote:

Also, Top and DC, what have your nightly activities been?

I know some of them ( :weird:

), but not all. I think we should now.

Monk...what the hell? Are you trying to oust all of our roles at once, or what?

Sighence · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 11:36 am

Landerpurex wrote:

It's all or nothing.

You want it all, you get it all.

Topsummoner · **Posted:** August 7th, 2010, 11:36 am

Nice blatant rolefishing Monk. :-s

Claiming roleblocker doesn't even come close to clearing you, especially because roleblocker is just as commonly a mafia role as it is a village.

And for the record I haven't done anything at night because I can't do anything at night.

Mafia 15 - A Party Game - Day 8

Who is online