All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic   Page 8 of 11
 [ 208 posts ] 
Go to page: « Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next »  Page:
Author Message

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 13th, 2016, 7:07 pm 
Burning my Dread.
Village Staff
Village Staff
User avatar

Joined: July 25th, 2004, 12:46 pm
Posts: 11,464
Status: Offline

Donor: Guardian (2009)
Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
I'm more insulted that I haven't made a "relevant interaction" yet. I will add your name in my list of enemies.
Image
It was dedicated to figuring out the relationship between Paidea (the prime suspect of the day) and Pyro (the first confirmed Mafia). You've had good interactions with others, but not anything that directly links or separates the two beyond me being called out for not going up against you.

Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
Doubly interesting that Pyro flipped mafioso in the end. I get there is a parable about glass houses that I should respect in this situation. BUT Paidea was actively trying to get people to unvote on a successful lynch.

Conversely, Siggy has been playing this game in the real back rows. Outside of putting some pressure on on the non-Aragorn voters Day 1 he's been willing to just roll with what is out there. I know he said something about some dodgy internet connections so maybe that can explain some things but it's nonetheless suspicious that Siggy's voice was more loud and poignant Day 1 than it was Day 2.
Sighence's lack of early presence is understandable with no Internet, but... the fact that it was one-and-done with no vote on day two is unlike him, and a big reason he's top of my list in red.
I've been there more than once where I've totally misread people and been in Paidea's shoes, so it's purely out of empathy that I'm not pushing for more pressure on him today. From the looks of it, he's not getting much support thus far. It'll probably be up to that soft roleclaim of his to save him, if anything. Remember, he also claimed to believe you Villager early day two for meta reasons. It's been in the open for some time... and Pyro stated a lack of belief that Paidea had a night action. Let's take it with a grain of salt until he comes out with it.

Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
As for Sparky, he was already pretty suspicious (though how much of that was a mafioso ploy to defend/delay Pyro?) and he didn't vote for Pyro despite having a chance. He chucked a meaningless vote on him after Thr saw to hammering Pyro... Not sure how I feel about that.
It's unfortunately hard to gauge how legit anything about that vote was. Lander mis-counted, Paidea either legit or acted like he mis-counted when turning more attention to Sparky... I still feel like that vote and the reaction was more staged than anything. Others can call it scummy, legit, whatever, but my word will probably stay "staged" for that one. That sadly doesn't make sense since I'm still entertaining the thought that Paidea's been set up, but the more I look at it the less I find myself believing it.

__________________
ImageImage
Goten is dead!


Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 13th, 2016, 9:12 pm 
Village Elder
Village Elder
User avatar

Joined: August 27th, 2007, 7:00 pm
Posts: 4,361
Gender: Male
Status: Offline
@Kikori,
I legitimately didn't see Aragorn's vote, like Lander. That whole page was absorbed by the Kikori vs. Pyro argument with some Sparky splashed in.

Kikori wrote:
...
As I believe two people are remaining as Mafia, here's my own mock Mafiality chart.
Kikori, Frank, Thr, Aragorn, Paidea, Sparky Sighence
I really would like everyone to look it over and voice their own opinions on the matter.

Sighence is logically the most suspicious player left, FMPOV. Sparky's fake hammer on Pyro is suspicious, along with the unexplained vote for You yesterday.
However, I am paranoid of You, Frank, and Aragorn for <reasons>. Thr is actually my top town read right now.

---

@Sparky,
SparkyAMS wrote:
Well with Pyros mafia outcome I completely redact my feelings on Kik, and I'll just blame myself for looking suspicious to Kik and therefore me being suspicious of Kik.

So far Sighence has been up in my top 3, and It doesn't help that he was the one who started my vote train yesterday, so I'm with you Kik, and I'm going to go with

Sighence for now.

That's not how suspicion works. That's not how any of this works! -_- Many people were suspicious of you for varying, inter-related reasons. Instead of replying to their concerns you just OMGUS'd them either with votes or FoSs. I agree with your current vote, at least.

---

@Frank, you never addressed this post:
- Furthermore, there is a growing connection between Frank and Kikori that I would like to lay out in the open. As stated above, both of them seemed willing to vote Sparky, but their votes ended up on Pyro. Both of them produced "cases" against Pyro, rather independently. Yet neither has really commented on the validity of each other's case. Kikori claims to be slightly suspicious of Frank, but Frank has not held an opinion of Kikori at all. I will say this, in case I die toNight, for the remaining villagers to look at:

All of this adds up to some definite connection between Frank and Kikori. What that connection is, remains to be determined.

It is especially troubling that neither Frank nor Kikori has offered "seconds" for their choices as Mafia and have committed to a Pyro lynch.

So I'm reposting it for attention.

Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
...
Perhaps it goes without saying but I do want to make it explicit that the successful lynch of Pyro does not, in itself, absolve Sparky of the suspicion surrounding him.

Especially since Sparky's vote didn't count towards said successful lynch. :?:

Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
I suppose that is possible... But I also really soured on Paidea yesterday. It is such a stark contrast to be behind the whole Aragorn lynch for information and then stonewall another lynch that could have given us the same "information" that we could have got with Aragorn.

You're comparing apples and kumquats. The Aragorn and Pyro trains are so drastically unlike that to interpret my difference in behavior between them is nonsensical. Aragorn was a novel D1 bandwagon that fizzled out almost as quickly as it gathered steam. Pyro was a slow-moving locomotive that pulled along train-cars as an argumentative case was made by Kikori and many points of contention by the opposite party were made. To suggest that the same "information" was at stake is unfair if used as a basis for reading my alignment.

Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
BUT Paidea was actively trying to get people to unvote on a successful lynch.

That no one could have known would be successful unless they were bussing. I was actively trying to get people to unvote Pyro because I believed he was town.

Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
Paidea wrote:
There is something affecting my gameplay but I want other people to chime in before I head that direction


I'm really interested to learn what this is. I'd definitely like to hear from all three of these guys (AND EVERYONE ELSE) before getting too involved with trying to find the votes for another lynch anyways.

You will have to forgive me for not spilling the beans yet, but I would like Aragorn, Sighence, and Thr to post first.

__________________
Hidden: 
Bloodypurex wrote:
The Rocky Horror wrote:
Paidea wrote:
And you're not dead yet? Topsummoner

~Paidea

His logic is flawless. Topsummoner

I concur. We must lynch him now for the sake of the metagame, we MUST teach people that they can't go around claiming "anniversary" and expect leniency. Topsummoner.


Top
 Profile YIM 
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 13th, 2016, 11:37 pm 
Inactive for 0 months
Village Elder
Village Elder
User avatar

Joined: October 27th, 2003, 8:35 am
Posts: 8,904
Location: Sol system. RVer#: 9874
Gender: Male
Status: Offline
Hi.

It seems the vast majority of the argument against me has to do with my activity pattern.

Firstly, I'd suggest that everyone's calibration was thrown a bit off by last game.

Secondly, I also kinda got married over the weekend. Posting proof smacks of flirting heavily with the 'no outside evidence' rule, and my flirting days are behind me, so y'all are just going to have to deal. Honeymoon travel eats up the last 12 hours of this day and the next night phase but otherwise I should be back on.

Paid's actively becoming anti-information. I'm not a lot better by virtue of giving a lack of information recently, but I'm clearly not the only one seeing the difference. If Spiro, whose early posts are functionally swappable with Paid's style, wound up being vanilla, I'm leaning away from a vote on him right now, but Pyro aping my posts and turning up mafia doesn't make that my most confident assertion.

Sparky, meanwhile, has a day and a half of suspicion on him and we collectively have let it go, up to and including outright admitting to giving him a pass because he's newer. It's bad for the town, and it's bad for him to learn, regardless of his role.


Top
 Profile YIM 
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 12:00 am 
(MC SparkyAMS)
Wizard
Wizard
User avatar

Joined: May 25th, 2010, 5:49 pm
Posts: 360
Location: Home Sweet Home
Gender: Male
Status: Offline
I'm.
not.
new.

This is like game 12 for me, I'm just positing more this time through. That's really all it is.

@Paidea: "That's not how suspicion works. That's not how any of this works!"

Yes. Yes it is.

I'm playing differently than normal, but only in the sense that I'm posting more than normal. Normally the only post that I make are to directly defend myself from straight out mafia lies. I'm choosing to post at other times than that this time around, and so people are getting to see how I am.

I've literally never been mafia in all of this time, and people like Kik know this, and so the way I've played in the past and now has always been as a villager. therefore if I'm playing differently than I must be mafia this time.

But from my stand point I'm the same me as normal, I've just chosen to talk more. So seeing Kik be suspicious of me looked from my standpoint as different than what I'm use to from him, and therefore suspicious as well.

But like I said, I get his view of me now, and don't see him as mafia. However you are still on my list.

If you can't see what I'm getting at then I can't help you.

__________________
ImageImageImage
JIMMY IMAGE FOR PRESIDENT!


Top
 Profile WWW 
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 12:07 am 
Village Czar
Village Czar

Joined: July 9th, 2003, 1:15 am
Posts: 2,251
Location: Michigan
Gender: Male
Status: Offline

Donor: Prince (2011)
Paidea wrote:
@Frank, you never addressed this post: ... So I'm reposting it for attention.

Paidea wrote:
You will have to forgive me for not spilling the beans yet, but I would like Aragorn, Sighence, and Thr to post first.

:?:

Frank wrote:
I suppose that is possible... But I also really soured on Paidea yesterday. It is such a stark contrast to be behind the whole Aragorn lynch for information and then stonewall another lynch that could have given us the same "information" that we could have got with Aragorn.
Paidea wrote:
You're comparing apples and kumquats. The Aragorn and Pyro trains are so drastically unlike that to interpret my difference in behavior between them is nonsensical. Aragorn was a novel D1 bandwagon that fizzled out almost as quickly as it gathered steam. Pyro was a slow-moving locomotive that pulled along train-cars as an argumentative case was made by Kikori and many points of contention by the opposite party were made. To suggest that the same "information" was at stake is unfair if used as a basis for reading my alignment.


It's not about the "information," it's about your motivation. What motivated you to get behind the Aragorn lynch with a serious vote. What motivated you to try and obstruct the Pyro lynch. Our situation had not changed from Day 1 to Day 2 other than losing Topsummoner. We're staring at the same murky weeds of uncertainty... If lynching Aragorn provided ANY useful information at all then surely the lynch on Pyro would provide some as well, right?

You're right in the sense the information was not the same in both lynches. We had a damn good reason to lynch Pyro. There was a lot of abnormal stuff happening with him. A Pyro lynch means we learn something. In a world where we successfully lynch Aragorn, what do we learn from that other than his alignment? If he flips mafia we learn something... But we don't if he is a villager. Conversely, in a world where we lynch Pyro last night and he flips villager... We learn we probably should not trust Kikori, Frank, or Thr.

And this is really why I don't understand your objection at all. We stood to learn more from the day 2 lynch than we did from our day 1 lynch. If whatever we stood to learn day one was sufficient enough for you to support it than I do not see why you would object to greater information on day 2 for the same risk. I do not see an angle where anyone who supported the day one lynch on Aragorn would not support the day 2 lynch on Pyro, unless they have an ulterior motive or more information.

Paidea wrote:
I was actively trying to get people to unvote Pyro because I believed he was town.


Did you actively believe Aragorn was mafia or were you just willing to chance it with him? If that, why weren't you willing to chance it with Pyro? This is my problem... I don't see how you had this conclusion that Pyro was definitively town and you construct a notable defense for him... But you were willing to lynch Aragorn. I can't square away the pieces in my head here. There is something here that explains this... I suppose it's going to be the revelation you're promising us.

Paidea on Day 2 wrote:
Furthermore, there is a growing connection between Frank and Kikori that I would like to lay out in the open. As stated above, both of them seemed willing to vote Sparky, but their votes ended up on Pyro. Both of them produced "cases" against Pyro, rather independently. Yet neither has really commented on the validity of each other's case. Kikori claims to be slightly suspicious of Frank, but Frank has not held an opinion of Kikori at all. I will say this, in case I die toNight, for the remaining villagers to look at:

All of this adds up to some definite connection between Frank and Kikori. What that connection is, remains to be determined.

It is especially troubling that neither Frank nor Kikori has offered "seconds" for their choices as Mafia and have committed to a Pyro lynch.


By your own words you conclude we produced "cases" independently... So that is somehow proof that we have some connection? I don't get it. What do you know that we don't know?

Kikori wrote:
It's unfortunately hard to gauge how legit anything about that vote was. Lander mis-counted, Paidea either legit or acted like he mis-counted when turning more attention to Sparky... I still feel like that vote and the reaction was more staged than anything. Others can call it scummy, legit, whatever, but my word will probably stay "staged" for that one.


I knew Aragorn had voted. Hence the whole my vote was 4 and Sparky was (supposed to be) the hammer. Though, when the posts start getting monolithic it's not hard to imagine a scanning eye glances right over a bolded name in a field of text. Speculating either way feels like it's a level too deep...

__________________
ImageSignature made by: Chicken.
HENNER MONTH! AWESOME! HENNER IS AWESOME! HENNER RULES! I LUVS TEH HENNER!


Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 12:22 am 
Village Czar
Village Czar

Joined: July 9th, 2003, 1:15 am
Posts: 2,251
Location: Michigan
Gender: Male
Status: Offline

Donor: Prince (2011)
Sparky wrote:
I'm playing differently than normal, but only in the sense that I'm posting more than normal.

Sparky wrote:
therefore if I'm playing differently than I must be mafia this time.

:?:

__________________
ImageSignature made by: Chicken.
HENNER MONTH! AWESOME! HENNER IS AWESOME! HENNER RULES! I LUVS TEH HENNER!


Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 7:20 am 
(MC SparkyAMS)
Wizard
Wizard
User avatar

Joined: May 25th, 2010, 5:49 pm
Posts: 360
Location: Home Sweet Home
Gender: Male
Status: Offline
Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
I'm
Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
mafia


It's almost like incomplete things skew things...

__________________
ImageImageImage
JIMMY IMAGE FOR PRESIDENT!


Top
 Profile WWW 
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 12:06 pm 
Village Elder
Village Elder
User avatar

Joined: August 27th, 2007, 7:00 pm
Posts: 4,361
Gender: Male
Status: Offline
Nobody has stuck a vote on me so I'm going to preemptively claim, because I have a good bit of information. I'm the Watcher.

1. I know who has the Key given by Top. I get this sickening feeling that the Key might be worthless for <reasons>.
2. <Redacted> is letting on way less than they actually know, and it's making me paranoid.
3. If there is only 1 mafia remaining, then <classified> is "clear."
4. If I assume everyone I've seen to be aligned with the Village, then the Mafia must have some pretty useful power.

It's Day 3 and the Village is in a good spot to coordinate. I am requesting that anyone else who is currently withholding information come forward.

Everybody involved in my Night reports (besides Top, whether Visitor or Visitee) voted for Pyro. Obviously last Night's report came after his lynch but there is some overlap. Pyro didn't suspect I have a Night ability, despite me dropping breadcrumbs left and right. These are the main reasons why I was opposed to the Pyro lynch.

__________________
Hidden: 
Bloodypurex wrote:
The Rocky Horror wrote:
Paidea wrote:
And you're not dead yet? Topsummoner

~Paidea

His logic is flawless. Topsummoner

I concur. We must lynch him now for the sake of the metagame, we MUST teach people that they can't go around claiming "anniversary" and expect leniency. Topsummoner.


Top
 Profile YIM 
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 1:13 pm 
Village Czar
Village Czar

Joined: July 9th, 2003, 1:15 am
Posts: 2,251
Location: Michigan
Gender: Male
Status: Offline

Donor: Prince (2011)
Paidea wrote:
1. I know who has the Key given by Top. I get this sickening feeling that the Key might be worthless for <reasons>.
2. <Redacted> is letting on way less than they actually know, and it's making me paranoid.
3. If there is only 1 mafia remaining, then <classified> is "clear."
4. If I assume everyone I've seen to be aligned with the Village, then the Mafia must have some pretty useful power.


I get you're worried about me but you've got to decide really quick if you can trust me.

__________________
ImageSignature made by: Chicken.
HENNER MONTH! AWESOME! HENNER IS AWESOME! HENNER RULES! I LUVS TEH HENNER!


Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 5:18 pm 
Burning my Dread.
Village Staff
Village Staff
User avatar

Joined: July 25th, 2004, 12:46 pm
Posts: 11,464
Status: Offline

Donor: Guardian (2009)
Paidea wrote:
Nobody has stuck a vote on me so I'm going to preemptively claim, because I have a good bit of information. I'm the Watcher.

1. I know who has the Key given by Top. I get this sickening feeling that the Key might be worthless for <reasons>.
2. <Redacted> is letting on way less than they actually know, and it's making me paranoid.
3. If there is only 1 mafia remaining, then <classified> is "clear."
4. If I assume everyone I've seen to be aligned with the Village, then the Mafia must have some pretty useful power.

It's Day 3 and the Village is in a good spot to coordinate. I am requesting that anyone else who is currently withholding information come forward.

Everybody involved in my Night reports (besides Top, whether Visitor or Visitee) voted for Pyro. Obviously last Night's report came after his lynch but there is some overlap. Pyro didn't suspect I have a Night ability, despite me dropping breadcrumbs left and right. These are the main reasons why I was opposed to the Pyro lynch.


Sounds like you're trying to be as incredibly vague as possible despite that we are in a position of needing more information to decide whether or not we can actively trust you. The irony here is that, as it stands, those of us who are about on the same page know who we feel we can and can't trust, and everyone's lists of suspects all seem to be eerily similar.

I can understand hoping to lure people into making mistakes of their own (lack of) night actions, but YOU'RE the one with something to prove here. Enough with this shady tagging of names; you come out with what you have and help us coordinate. Now that you've finally claimed, you should logically be the Mafia's kill target for the night. Fat lot of good it'll do us to know <redacted> and <classified> are somewhere on your list, right? Maybe we'll cross our fingers and hope <somebody> comes out with their <reasons>. Lot of good we'll get from that. Get your spine back in order, man up, and help us first. The specifics of who or what you can watch at night and the NAMES of who you've seen would be nice.

__________________
ImageImage
Goten is dead!


Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 5:41 pm 
Burning my Dread.
Village Staff
Village Staff
User avatar

Joined: July 25th, 2004, 12:46 pm
Posts: 11,464
Status: Offline

Donor: Guardian (2009)
Let me take a few stabs at things to get that ball rolling, though. I'm going to assume your version of the Watcher watches one single person's house on any given night to enter it, as per EpicMafia's description (same as what I used to examine Topsummoner's role).
Paidea wrote:
Everybody involved in my Night reports (besides Top, whether Visitor or Visitee) voted for Pyro.

It's only been two night phases. Night one, you could have only managed to watch the person who Topsummoner gave their key to. What gets me is, how do you suspect the key may be worthless? That would involve something as insanely specific as knowing the recipient has a night role, and didn't use it Night Two in lieu of protecting themselves.
Paidea wrote:
2. <Redacted> is letting on way less than they actually know, and it's making me paranoid.

Good to know. Why should that name be withheld? And how do you know they know more than they let on?
Paidea wrote:
3. If there is only 1 mafia remaining, then <classified> is "clear."

How could you know this? The Watcher, in the case of this argument, watches to see who has visited any specific house. What combination of watched players and visitors could lead to knowing someone could be 100% clear?
Paidea wrote:
4. If I assume everyone I've seen to be aligned with the Village, then the Mafia must have some pretty useful power.
For all this paranoia, are you afraid of telling us who you saw and where they place on the 1-2-3-4 chart because it directly conflicts with out list of suspects?
Paidea wrote:
Everybody involved in my Night reports (besides Top, whether Visitor or Visitee) voted for Pyro.

Alright, then. If you decide to withhold absolutely everything else, at least tell us HOW MANY of those who voted for Pyro have been watched. I'm expecting far more than just an answer to this, given your knowledge stands to help the Village far more than the Mafia, though... and the rolefishing you're asking us to walk into helps the Mafia more than the Village.

__________________
ImageImage
Goten is dead!


Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 6:03 pm 
Burning my Dread.
Village Staff
Village Staff
User avatar

Joined: July 25th, 2004, 12:46 pm
Posts: 11,464
Status: Offline

Donor: Guardian (2009)
Sighence wrote:
It seems the vast majority of the argument against me has to do with my activity pattern.

Firstly, I'd suggest that everyone's calibration was thrown a bit off by last game.

Secondly, I also kinda got married over the weekend. Posting proof smacks of flirting heavily with the 'no outside evidence' rule, and my flirting days are behind me, so y'all are just going to have to deal. Honeymoon travel eats up the last 12 hours of this day and the next night phase but otherwise I should be back on.

Paid's actively becoming anti-information. I'm not a lot better by virtue of giving a lack of information recently, but I'm clearly not the only one seeing the difference. If Spiro, whose early posts are functionally swappable with Paid's style, wound up being vanilla, I'm leaning away from a vote on him right now, but Pyro aping my posts and turning up mafia doesn't make that my most confident assertion.

Sparky, meanwhile, has a day and a half of suspicion on him and we collectively have let it go, up to and including outright admitting to giving him a pass because he's newer. It's bad for the town, and it's bad for him to learn, regardless of his role.

Let's answer this one in order of line breaks, then...
>What is with this obsession of regarding peoples' activity before their behaviors? The last person who obsessed over it and tried to force it out as a big point of defense for themselves turned out to be Mafia, remember?
>The hell if last game skewed anything for us, if anything it was a boon. It's offered a much better look into how people perform without metagame knowledge hindering their attempts at making arguments and cooperation between village and mafia.
>Congrats on the marriage. I'll still never understand why people sign up for team games when they know their presence will be limited by such plans, but marriage is a pretty big something and I wish you the best with it. That said, for the times you've been on since Day Two to present, there's been plenty more content with which you of all Mafia veterans should've been able to poke holes in and bring up insightful questions about others' opinions and behaviors.
>Have you seen peoples' order of suspicion? You, Paidea, and Sparky are still high up on everyone's lists (excluding each of you individually), but the focus has shifted to the interactions Pyro has had with everyone, ESPECIALLY Paidea due to their unwillingness to conflict with or vote for each other.

__________________
ImageImage
Goten is dead!


Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 6:12 pm 
RV's Swimming
Village Legend
Village Legend

Joined: January 11th, 2005, 2:30 pm
Posts: 3,839
Location: Southend on Sea, UK
Gender: Male
Status: Offline

Donor: Guardian (2010)
Quote:
@Aragorn sorry I missed your FOS on Frank. If you're town then consider the Kikori connection tomorrow please.

Paid, what did you mean by this? The Frank and Kikori link re the Pyro lynch? I'm not really seeing that as a genuine connection. It's possibly there's some mirroring going on by say Sparky to appear town? I don't think it's a convincing argument though.

Seeing as mock mafiality charts are all the rage here's mine:

Aragorn, Kikori, Thr, Sig, Paid, Sparky, Frank

At this point I actually think Frank is mafia and Kikori is town (which obviously doesn't align with your theories, Paid). Everyone else I don't have a strong read on. I'm seeing some validity in Kikori's argument that Pyro and Paid were deliberately distancing themselves from each other but after your claim I'm reserving judgement until we know more. For now my vote would be on [b]Frank[b] (that flipflop vote stil doesn't sit right with me, sorry).

__________________
|Items and Monster Database Staff|Villager Writer|Guide Writer|Image
|Legend|
Gamestar is my twin :D



Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 6:15 pm 
RV's Swimming
Village Legend
Village Legend

Joined: January 11th, 2005, 2:30 pm
Posts: 3,839
Location: Southend on Sea, UK
Gender: Male
Status: Offline

Donor: Guardian (2010)
Oops, that should have been Frank

__________________
|Items and Monster Database Staff|Villager Writer|Guide Writer|Image
|Legend|
Gamestar is my twin :D



Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 6:44 pm 
Burning my Dread.
Village Staff
Village Staff
User avatar

Joined: July 25th, 2004, 12:46 pm
Posts: 11,464
Status: Offline

Donor: Guardian (2009)
Gonna ask a few things of you, Aragorn.

1.) What's got Sighence dead center in your chart, compared to many of us giving him a Mafia lean?
2.) Will you ever turn your BBcode on entirely? :p
3.) Think you could explain a little more why Frank's refusal to stick to a faulty lynch is so suspicious? It's a lynch that had been logically debunked by one since-confirmed-villager (Top) and avoided altogether by another since-confirmed-villager (Spiro), and also avoided until day's end by the person-not-you you feel strongest to be a villager (Me). To stick with that one single suspicion for so long has to stem from something more than one single gut feeling among eight pages of is... confusing, at the least.

__________________
ImageImage
Goten is dead!


Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 9:17 pm 
Village Czar
Village Czar

Joined: July 9th, 2003, 1:15 am
Posts: 2,251
Location: Michigan
Gender: Male
Status: Offline

Donor: Prince (2011)
So we have roughly 24 hours to find a lynch tonight. That may prove to be difficult considering time zones but the day ends at ~1 AM Wednesday EST. This will be around the time we had the most activity yesterday but we're pressing for activity on a weekday over a weekend. Kind of difficult but not impossible.

Aragorn wrote:
At this point I actually think Frank is mafia and Kikori is town (which obviously doesn't align with your theories, Paid). Everyone else I don't have a strong read on. I'm seeing some validity in Kikori's argument that Pyro and Paid were deliberately distancing themselves from each other but after your claim I'm reserving judgement until we know more. For now my vote would be on Frank (that flipflop vote still doesn't sit right with me, sorry).

Damn you can't just let that go... :?: Like I said before once I realized it was a SRS lynch and not people just having some fun razzing on you I backed off.

I do really want to try and move forward here... I don't know if Paidea is just being super paranoid or just filibustering... Either way, it's not good for the town. Paidea and Siggy are both solid choices for a lynch. We may have a bit "safer" of a lynch going with Siggy to try and figure out what the hell is Paidea's up to... Though his brazen secrecy does not sit well with me either.

__________________
ImageSignature made by: Chicken.
HENNER MONTH! AWESOME! HENNER IS AWESOME! HENNER RULES! I LUVS TEH HENNER!


Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 10:57 pm 
Inactive for 0 months
Village Elder
Village Elder
User avatar

Joined: October 27th, 2003, 8:35 am
Posts: 8,904
Location: Sol system. RVer#: 9874
Gender: Male
Status: Offline
Kikori wrote:
Sighence wrote:
It seems the vast majority of the argument against me has to do with my activity pattern.

Firstly, I'd suggest that everyone's calibration was thrown a bit off by last game.

Secondly, I also kinda got married over the weekend. Posting proof smacks of flirting heavily with the 'no outside evidence' rule, and my flirting days are behind me, so y'all are just going to have to deal. Honeymoon travel eats up the last 12 hours of this day and the next night phase but otherwise I should be back on.

Paid's actively becoming anti-information. I'm not a lot better by virtue of giving a lack of information recently, but I'm clearly not the only one seeing the difference. If Spiro, whose early posts are functionally swappable with Paid's style, wound up being vanilla, I'm leaning away from a vote on him right now, but Pyro aping my posts and turning up mafia doesn't make that my most confident assertion.

Sparky, meanwhile, has a day and a half of suspicion on him and we collectively have let it go, up to and including outright admitting to giving him a pass because he's newer. It's bad for the town, and it's bad for him to learn, regardless of his role.

Let's answer this one in order of line breaks, then...
>What is with this obsession of regarding peoples' activity before their behaviors? The last person who obsessed over it and tried to force it out as a big point of defense for themselves turned out to be Mafia, remember?
>The hell if last game skewed anything for us, if anything it was a boon. It's offered a much better look into how people perform without metagame knowledge hindering their attempts at making arguments and cooperation between village and mafia.
>Congrats on the marriage. I'll still never understand why people sign up for team games when they know their presence will be limited by such plans, but marriage is a pretty big something and I wish you the best with it. That said, for the times you've been on since Day Two to present, there's been plenty more content with which you of all Mafia veterans should've been able to poke holes in and bring up insightful questions about others' opinions and behaviors.
>Have you seen peoples' order of suspicion? You, Paidea, and Sparky are still high up on everyone's lists (excluding each of you individually), but the focus has shifted to the interactions Pyro has had with everyone, ESPECIALLY Paidea due to their unwillingness to conflict with or vote for each other.



The behavior - which seems to somewhat revolve around failing to vote for Pyro (which doing anyway might've been called suspicious depending on timing, as we've seen) - is a result of my relative inactivity. Trying to use my relative inactivity is a mistake specifically in my case as I was pressed up against the wall all game. Signing up was a calculated call. The reality isn't quite what I was hoping, sure, but I'm not about to drop the game.

All that aside, orders of suspicion are speculative and subjective. I appreciate the attempt at information-giving it provides, though. As for me, my vote is a pretty obvious indicator of where I stand, and I'm rarely above mentioning other suspects. You'll notice that I'm currently suspicious of two of the three you listed. My reasons may sometimes be different than others, sure, but exactly what's that matter? Would you rather I parrot someone else?


Top
 Profile YIM 
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 11:06 pm 
Village Elder
Village Elder
User avatar

Joined: August 27th, 2007, 7:00 pm
Posts: 4,361
Gender: Male
Status: Offline
So things have finally come full circle. Frank is positively mafia. The case starts after I finish replying to Kikori's questions.

Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
Paidea wrote:
1. I know who has the Key given by Top. I get this sickening feeling that the Key might be worthless for <reasons>.
2. <Redacted> is letting on way less than they actually know, and it's making me paranoid.
3. If there is only 1 mafia remaining, then <classified> is "clear."
4. If I assume everyone I've seen to be aligned with the Village, then the Mafia must have some pretty useful power.


I get you're worried about me but you've got to decide really quick if you can trust me.

Here Frank admits to being <Redacted>. Glad we got that out of the way. Keep this in mind.

Kikori wrote:
...
I can understand hoping to lure people into making mistakes of their own (lack of) night actions, but YOU'RE the one with something to prove here. Enough with this shady tagging of names; you come out with what you have and help us coordinate. Now that you've finally claimed, you should logically be the Mafia's kill target for the night. Fat lot of good it'll do us to know <redacted> and <classified> are somewhere on your list, right? Maybe we'll cross our fingers and hope <somebody> comes out with their <reasons>. Lot of good we'll get from that. Get your spine back in order, man up, and help us first. The specifics of who or what you can watch at night and the NAMES of who you've seen would be nice.

...and it worked. The way Frank has been playing and responded, there is no way he can be coming from a Villager's mindset. <Classified> is remaining that way because I'm pretty sure they're more valuable than me alive. I can watch anyone. Some of the names are on their way, keep reading.

Kikori wrote:
Let me take a few stabs at things to get that ball rolling, though. I'm going to assume your version of the Watcher watches one single person's house on any given night to enter it, as per EpicMafia's description (same as what I used to examine Topsummoner's role).
Paidea wrote:
Everybody involved in my Night reports (besides Top, whether Visitor or Visitee) voted for Pyro.

It's only been two night phases. Night one, you could have only managed to watch the person who Topsummoner gave their key to. What gets me is, how do you suspect the key may be worthless? That would involve something as insanely specific as knowing the recipient has a night role, and didn't use it Night Two in lieu of protecting themselves.

Since Frank has admitted to being <redacted>, and I said that there was a Frank-Kikori connection on Day 2, it only takes a little bit of shifting the puzzle pieces around to determine that YOU have the Key. The Key is worthless because either A) you are Mafia, so anything you do with the Key will be WIFOM-related and can only hurt the Town or leave it neutral or B) you are a Villager, but obviously not high up on the Mafia's hit-list. You led the charge against Pyro and you're still alive, and now that I've claimed I might be the Mafia's next kill. I am honestly surprised that you didn't put these clues together yourself.

Kikori wrote:
Paidea wrote:
2. <Redacted> is letting on way less than they actually know, and it's making me paranoid.

Good to know. Why should that name be withheld? And how do you know they know more than they let on?

I'm not sure how you can ask this question immediately after Frank admits to being <redacted>. But more on this later.

Kikori wrote:
Paidea wrote:
3. If there is only 1 mafia remaining, then <classified> is "clear."

How could you know this? The Watcher, in the case of this argument, watches to see who has visited any specific house. What combination of watched players and visitors could lead to knowing someone could be 100% clear?

If there is one Mafia remaining and I see Player A visit Player B, and Player C dies, that means that Player A cannot have committed the kill.

Kikori wrote:
Paidea wrote:
4. If I assume everyone I've seen to be aligned with the Village, then the Mafia must have some pretty useful power.
For all this paranoia, are you afraid of telling us who you saw and where they place on the 1-2-3-4 chart because it directly conflicts with out list of suspects?

Somewhat. The current theory is that Pyro was bussed by at the very least 1, if not 2 Mafia.

Kikori wrote:
Paidea wrote:
Everybody involved in my Night reports (besides Top, whether Visitor or Visitee) voted for Pyro.

Alright, then. If you decide to withhold absolutely everything else, at least tell us HOW MANY of those who voted for Pyro have been watched. I'm expecting far more than just an answer to this, given your knowledge stands to help the Village far more than the Mafia, though... and the rolefishing you're asking us to walk into helps the Mafia more than the Village.

3/5 of the voters on Pyro's lynch have been part of my reports.

Aragorn Ix wrote:
...

At this point I actually think Frank is mafia and Kikori is town (which obviously doesn't align with your theories, Paid).

Except that that is exactly my prevailing theory now. Frank bussed Pyro.

---

Frank KNOWS I saw him visit Kikori and is STILL acting oblivious to knowing anything about a "Frank-Kikori" connection. I first brought it up here, where it was denied by Kikori and ignored by Frank. Then after I reposted it, this was Frank's response:
Quote:
...By your own words you conclude we produced "cases" independently... So that is somehow proof that we have some connection? I don't get it. What do you know that we don't know?...

Frank continues to feign ignorance.

And here, Frank is trying to mount suspicion on me after I claimed Watcher and despite knowing that I saw him visit Kikori. There is no way that townie!Frank reacts like this and doesn't try to move forward with me.
Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
...

I do really want to try and move forward here... I don't know if Paidea is just being super paranoid or just filibustering... Either way, it's not good for the town. Paidea and Siggy are both solid choices for a lynch. We may have a bit "safer" of a lynch going with Siggy to try and figure out what the hell is Paidea's up to... Though his brazen secrecy does not sit well with me either.

This is the nail in the coffin for me.

Let's recap:
- I drop breadcrumbs left and right.
- Frank acknowledges said crumb but rejects and does not play party to the information (three separate times).
- Frank acts as though my claim is not legit and I'm still worthy of a lynch.

That is not a Villager perspective. Frank is playing highly deceptively. One more thing, Frank's vote for Pyro yesterDay:

Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
Siggy wrote:
Frank, why does Sparky's vote on Kik tip the scales in favor of Pyro being mafia for you?

I don't think that's a vote a mafioso Sparky makes to avoid going to the gallows. Or perhaps it is and he played me.

Pyro wrote:
Your confidence in that 20 hours is a large concern to me. Majority of those hours aren't the regular active hours. You seem interested in letting things slow down.

Pyro wrote:
I'm going to unvote Sparky and vote kikori.

:?:

Pyro, you seem to have accepted your fate... but what really is confusing me is this unvote here. By your own word you have serious doubts about the voters out there... Say if I believed that Kikori may be mafia and I follow suit, what happens? Are there two more votes out there? Does Sparky stay on the train? I had two choices when I first made it clear my vote was incoming. Either I could vote for Sparky or I could vote for you. And your unvote has forced my hand.

It wasn't as if I wasn't seriously mulling Sparky.

This reads like a set-up to bus. Perhaps Pyro unvoted specifically so Frank could have a "solid" reason to vote him. The "you have accepted your fate" line seems VERY orchestrated considering Frank's vote was only third in the train. It would seem more authentic if Frank were the hammer, or even the 4th vote. But at that point in time, Pyro's fate was not yet sealed... unless Frank and Pyro had a plan to bus all along.

__________________
Hidden: 
Bloodypurex wrote:
The Rocky Horror wrote:
Paidea wrote:
And you're not dead yet? Topsummoner

~Paidea

His logic is flawless. Topsummoner

I concur. We must lynch him now for the sake of the metagame, we MUST teach people that they can't go around claiming "anniversary" and expect leniency. Topsummoner.


Top
 Profile YIM 
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 14th, 2016, 11:38 pm 
Village Czar
Village Czar

Joined: July 9th, 2003, 1:15 am
Posts: 2,251
Location: Michigan
Gender: Male
Status: Offline

Donor: Prince (2011)
This is what I've been waiting on...? :?:

OK, fine...

I am the Jack of All Trades. I visited Kikori night one to investigate him. I visited him again night 2 but was unable to protect him. I hope this is because Kikori used his key to protect himself... though there is some possibility there is a role blocker out there which is why I wasn't completely stoked to come forward. Oh well, c'est la vie.

I gave your story credence because the role you claimed to have sounded town. I haven't been convinced by your play that you are town. You have some ability to see people's actions, this is certain. However, what really isn't certain is who you're putting your actions to use for. Anyone who pulled the stunt you pulled day two would have been killed on the spot... I regret allowing this circus to come forward. Either you're town and you've been missing reads all game or you're mafia trying to sneak a free town kill at this point. I know which one I'm betting on.

Paidea

__________________
ImageSignature made by: Chicken.
HENNER MONTH! AWESOME! HENNER IS AWESOME! HENNER RULES! I LUVS TEH HENNER!


Top
 Profile
 

 Post subject: Re: Real Life Mafia: Day Three: One step forward, two steps
PostPosted: November 15th, 2016, 12:09 am 
Village Elder
Village Elder
User avatar

Joined: August 27th, 2007, 7:00 pm
Posts: 4,361
Gender: Male
Status: Offline
Frank 4.0.1 wrote:
This is what I've been waiting on...? :?:

OK, fine...

I am the Jack of All Trades. I visited Kikori night one to investigate him. I visited him again night 2 but was unable to protect him. I hope this is because Kikori used his key to protect himself... though there is some possibility there is a role blocker out there which is why I wasn't completely stoked to come forward. Oh well, c'est la vie.

I gave your story credence because the role you claimed to have sounded town. I haven't been convinced by your play that you are town. You have some ability to see people's actions, this is certain. However, what really isn't certain is who you're putting your actions to use for. Anyone who pulled the stunt you pulled day two would have been killed on the spot... I regret allowing this circus to come forward. Either you're town and you've been missing reads all game or you're mafia trying to sneak a free town kill at this point. I know which one I'm betting on.

Paidea

You gave my story credence? Show me. By pretending like you didn't have the slightest clue what I was talking about? By suggesting I was a good lynch target?

If I wasn't putting my actions to use for the town why would I breadcrumb my N1 results in case I died? If I was Mafia why would I kill Spiro instead of you, who I knew would be a PR?

Do you have anything to say in defense towards my other points?

__________________
Hidden: 
Bloodypurex wrote:
The Rocky Horror wrote:
Paidea wrote:
And you're not dead yet? Topsummoner

~Paidea

His logic is flawless. Topsummoner

I concur. We must lynch him now for the sake of the metagame, we MUST teach people that they can't go around claiming "anniversary" and expect leniency. Topsummoner.


Top
 Profile YIM 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 8 of 11
 [ 208 posts ] 
Go to page: « Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next »  Page:

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  

cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
The Village and this web site are © 2002-2012

ThePub 2.0 - Designed by Goten & Jackstick. Coded by Glodenox & Henner.
With many thanks to the Website Team!