Palo wrote:
That's the thing Lander I know it's a pretty big risk if they Clowney but he has so much potential to be something great :/ Also idk... I feel that the Texans could get a good quarterback later down the draft... imo the quarterbacks this year look pretty ok stats wise, but I just got a gut feeling that none of them are going to produce much :l. Don't quote me on that tho
Yeah there are no Andrew Lucks in this draft, for sure. But who impacts a game more, a QB or a DE? Which do they need more? They have JJ Watt and a pretty good defense, their offense is abysmal. Especially now without mr. Facilitator, Matt Schuab. They could trade down with, say, the Lions, gain a 3rd round pick, and still get a QB.
Dr Henry wrote:
I have vague hopes for Khalil Mack in the first round, hopefully pick up a decent QB in the second.
By 8th pick the 'best' QBs will be gone, so it will be a waste to get one then, when we could potentially get the 'best' in another position.
At least Cassel will do enough for us. We lost it in the defence last year, not offence. I personally like the fact that Peterson and Cassel will have another year to better their link-up and really get some points on the board.
TBH if the Lions took Mack or Anthony Barr I wouldn't be too upset. If the vikes got Mack that would be beast. I get what you're saying about the QBs in this draft. But Cassel is not the guy to carry you to the postseason, or even to a winning record. AP is all the vikings have, I think they are in full rebuild mode at this point after firing Leslie Frazier (warranted) and giving up on Christian Ponder (warranted).Statistics: Posted by Landerpurex — April 4th, 2014, 10:40 pm
]]>