Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_base has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 428

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_forum has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 844

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_topic has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 973
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
RuneVillage.com Where Gamers Escape! 2010-03-27T12:50:58-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/feed.php?f=248&t=431579 2010-03-27T12:50:58-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212686#p10212686 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> Statistics: Posted by Godders — March 27th, 2010, 12:50 pm


]]>
2010-03-27T12:34:06-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212675#p10212675 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]>
But for Romeo and Juliet: if by overdone you mean melodramatic with characters doing silly things, I'd agree. I just don't see that as a negative. It's a tragedy about two teenage lovers who were doomed from the opening lines, so of course their actions are rash and foolish.

The plot by itself is nothing very original - I'm sure it was appeared hackneyed to the original audience. But the poesy reaches a level of sublimity rarely matched in literature, Mercutio's Queen Mab is a wonder and sometimes it can be the simple things which touch us the deepest (which is not to say that there are depths to be charted if you so wish) . A theatre-goer walking out of a performance of Hamlet was asked what she thought of it. "It's just a bunch of cliches strung together." Its literary influence has been so pervasive (to say nothing of the hordes of teenage girls obsessed with it) that it can be difficult to appreciate its merits, but it has many.

Statistics: Posted by Tweedy — March 27th, 2010, 12:34 pm


]]>
2010-03-27T11:58:51-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212661#p10212661 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> Statistics: Posted by Blackmage172 — March 27th, 2010, 11:58 am


]]>
2010-03-27T09:37:19-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212623#p10212623 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> Blackmage172 wrote:

n00b 4 m1nin wrote:
Im doing the same thing, only with Romeo and Juliet

I like Shakespeare. I really do. Except that play sucks.

The play does suck until you understand what your saying, the Wet Maid it always using Innuendo.

Statistics: Posted by Godders — March 27th, 2010, 9:37 am


]]>
2010-03-27T07:11:31-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212588#p10212588 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> Blackmage172 wrote:

Kenneth Branagh's version is the best. His is frequently used in Shakespeare classrooms since it provides such an accurate portrayal that it's almost word-for-word from the play. Very well done and accurate, seeing as how Branagh is widely known in theatre as a pretty high-up Shakespearean scholar.

I really liked that version too.

Anyway, if you need the analysis of Hamlet (themes, symbolism, motifs, etc.) sparknotes is your best friend!:
http://www.sparknotes.com/shakespeare/hamlet

Statistics: Posted by A5chow — March 27th, 2010, 7:11 am


]]>
2010-03-26T10:47:15-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212422#p10212422 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> n00b 4 m1nin wrote:

Im doing the same thing, only with Romeo and Juliet

I like Shakespeare. I really do. Except that play sucks.

Statistics: Posted by Blackmage172 — March 26th, 2010, 10:47 am


]]>
2010-03-26T03:06:25-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212395#p10212395 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> Statistics: Posted by Godders — March 26th, 2010, 3:06 am


]]>
2010-03-26T00:35:00-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212374#p10212374 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> n00b 4 m1nin wrote:

Why do you need to know if there is a movie closely linked to Hamlet?

I got a Midterm on Hamlet this Monday. And I just wanted to see the story line played out... :O

Thank you for all the feedback!

Statistics: Posted by Zone Ant — March 26th, 2010, 12:35 am


]]>
2010-03-25T12:06:47-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212231#p10212231 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> Kenneth Branagh's version is the best. His is frequently used in Shakespeare classrooms since it provides such an accurate portrayal that it's almost word-for-word from the play. Very well done and accurate, seeing as how Branagh is widely known in theatre as a pretty high-up Shakespearean scholar.

Statistics: Posted by Blackmage172 — March 25th, 2010, 12:06 pm


]]>
2010-03-25T01:58:32-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212166#p10212166 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> Tweedy wrote:

Tanksandguns wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_%281948_film%29

That's probably as close as you could get.

Just be aware that Olivier's version cuts out a lot of the play (inevitable since it's only 2 and a half hours) and really plays up the Oedipus angle. Branagh's version of Hamlet is supposed to be uncut, but I haven't seen it.


I don't think Uncut couild do much harm, it's not as if it's gonna take out the important parts.

Statistics: Posted by Godders — March 25th, 2010, 1:58 am


]]>
2010-03-24T23:46:25-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212140#p10212140 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> Tanksandguns wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_%281948_film%29

That's probably as close as you could get.

Just be aware that Olivier's version cuts out a lot of the play (inevitable since it's only 2 and a half hours) and really plays up the Oedipus angle. Branagh's version of Hamlet is supposed to be uncut, but I haven't seen it.

Statistics: Posted by Tweedy — March 24th, 2010, 11:46 pm


]]>
2010-03-24T13:42:50-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212057#p10212057 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> Statistics: Posted by Godders — March 24th, 2010, 1:42 pm


]]>
2010-03-24T13:29:50-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212054#p10212054 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_%281948_film%29

That's probably as close as you could get.

Statistics: Posted by Tanksandguns — March 24th, 2010, 1:29 pm


]]>
2010-03-24T13:01:46-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212049#p10212049 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> Statistics: Posted by Zone Ant — March 24th, 2010, 1:01 pm


]]>
2010-03-24T12:48:58-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212047#p10212047 <![CDATA[Re: Hamlet]]> Statistics: Posted by A5chow — March 24th, 2010, 12:48 pm


]]>
2010-03-24T12:43:41-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=431579&p=10212045#p10212045 <![CDATA[Hamlet]]> Statistics: Posted by Zone Ant — March 24th, 2010, 12:43 pm


]]>