Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_base has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 428

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_forum has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 844

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_topic has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 973
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
RuneVillage.com Where Gamers Escape! 2010-09-21T07:08:09-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/feed.php?f=248&t=430387 2010-09-21T07:08:09-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10245533#p10245533 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> King Gimli wrote:

avatar was pretty spectacular. now i am trying to grip my head around to which movie i watched after i returned from the cinema that night..

I believe it involved several pixie creatures and a lumberjack.


Lol, I remember that movie! That just brings me back to my childhood years.

Statistics: Posted by Phantomrose — September 21st, 2010, 7:08 am


]]>
2010-09-14T21:20:37-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10244702#p10244702 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]>
I believe it involved several pixie creatures and a lumberjack.

Statistics: Posted by King Gimli — September 14th, 2010, 9:20 pm


]]>
2010-09-11T10:12:57-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10244280#p10244280 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Statistics: Posted by Archbishop of Banana — September 11th, 2010, 10:12 am


]]>
2010-09-10T21:02:13-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10244211#p10244211 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Statistics: Posted by Phantomrose — September 10th, 2010, 9:02 pm


]]>
2010-09-08T20:49:09-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10243943#p10243943 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Statistics: Posted by Matt258 — September 8th, 2010, 8:49 pm


]]>
2010-06-20T21:56:04-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10231740#p10231740 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Statistics: Posted by Hostile_Amish — June 20th, 2010, 9:56 pm


]]>
2010-06-12T00:21:18-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10230088#p10230088 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> TX-55 wrote:

Applequest wrote:
I saw it in 2D and it was still very good. Im gonna go out on a limb and say the 3D had little to do with its success. The CGI was completely impressive and unprecedented even in 1 less dimension.


Maybe I just wasn't amused because I had already seen Pocahontas.

Ferngully combined with Dances with Wolves damn it!

Statistics: Posted by Quan — June 12th, 2010, 12:21 am


]]>
2010-06-11T00:05:47-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10229889#p10229889 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Applequest wrote:

I saw it in 2D and it was still very good. Im gonna go out on a limb and say the 3D had little to do with its success. The CGI was completely impressive and unprecedented even in 1 less dimension.


Maybe I just wasn't amused because I had already seen Pocahontas.

Statistics: Posted by Pyro3000 — June 11th, 2010, 12:05 am


]]>
2010-06-10T16:24:18-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10229840#p10229840 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Statistics: Posted by Applequest — June 10th, 2010, 4:24 pm


]]>
2010-06-10T05:48:07-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10226090#p10226090 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> TX-55 wrote:

Watched it in 2D. Wasn't too impressed. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that if it wasn't for the 3D (that is apparently really well done) then no one would have cared about Avatar in the slightest.

Not much of a limb since that's the main reason people praised it. ^_^

Statistics: Posted by Tweedy — June 10th, 2010, 5:48 am


]]>
2010-06-09T04:06:24-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10225928#p10225928 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Statistics: Posted by Pyro3000 — June 9th, 2010, 4:06 am


]]>
2010-06-05T02:03:55-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10225344#p10225344 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Statistics: Posted by Dark Paladin — June 5th, 2010, 2:03 am


]]>
2010-06-04T15:36:37-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=10225243#p10225243 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Statistics: Posted by sirchancelot — June 4th, 2010, 3:36 pm


]]>
2010-02-14T03:39:59-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=3566102#p3566102 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Rory wrote:

I saw this, and it somehow reminded me of Jackstick.
Image


That made me lol for a couple minutes straight.

Statistics: Posted by Landerpurex — February 14th, 2010, 3:39 am


]]>
2010-02-12T22:20:19-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=3565989#p3565989 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Image

Statistics: Posted by Rory — February 12th, 2010, 10:20 pm


]]>
2010-02-08T23:41:24-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=3565237#p3565237 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Donut Juice wrote:

You guys are crazy. :P

I want to see it a second time, at least.


I recommend seeing it in 3D the second time. The movie does seem so much better because of the extra layer of depth that the 3D adds to it.

Statistics: Posted by Scar — February 8th, 2010, 11:41 pm


]]>
2010-02-08T14:29:16-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=3565136#p3565136 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]>

I want to see it a second time, at least.

Statistics: Posted by Donut Juice — February 8th, 2010, 2:29 pm


]]>
2010-02-07T15:29:49-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=3564894#p3564894 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Rayseima wrote:

I could make like four huge paragraphs on how awesome this movie is in epic detail, but I don't have the time, so this'll be short.
I swear, this movie was AMAZING, if anyone is reading this right now and hasn't seen this movie, you DEFINITELY need to see it. The plot was great (kinda reminded me of Dances With Wolves), the characters were well developed, and the graphics were, of course, EXTRAAWESOMEAMAZINGINGING. With a movie with a $300 million budget, you'd definitely expect to get that kind of quality. I'd see it, like, a lot more times if I weren't studying for finals this week ( D: ), but after that I'm gonna see it, like, more than Jackstick (which is more than three).

Oh and by the way if any of you hadn't heard yet...




^^ i second this XD :D

ive seen it twice. once with Rayseima (we're good friends) in 3D because Imax was sold out and once with my family in Imax. OMG i want to go see it again in theaters but im not sure if i will be able to :(

Statistics: Posted by andand12345 — February 7th, 2010, 3:29 pm


]]>
2010-02-04T23:07:16-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=3564499#p3564499 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> It was just as awesome as the first two times.

I dunno if I'll see if a fourth time in theatres, but I'm definitely buying it on Blu-ray.

Statistics: Posted by Jackstick — February 4th, 2010, 11:07 pm


]]>
2010-02-02T17:06:05-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=430387&p=3564081#p3564081 <![CDATA[Re: Avatar]]> Rocky Martin wrote:

Rayseima wrote:
Oh and by the way if any of you hadn't heard yet...

Huh. I didn't know that a Sci Fi movie has never taken the top prize at the Academy Awards. That would be pretty nifty if Avatar changed that. :^_^:

Well, Avatar is, yes, the highest grossing movie of all time. But when you adjust it for inflation and whatnot it's like #26 or something on highest grossing movie of all time. Gone With the Wind is first, I believe. :P

Statistics: Posted by Rayseima — February 2nd, 2010, 5:06 pm


]]>