Snake1235 wrote:
2. Nobody said anything about race. As far as I'm concerned, the race card needs to die.
but I'm a Latino-Indonesian-African American, sir. It's all I know.
Reminds me about a joke about the sound of a sprinkler.....
Statistics: Posted by Spirographed — December 17th, 2011, 5:36 pm
]]>
]]>
2. Nobody said anything about race. As far as I'm concerned, the race card needs to die.
but I'm a Latino-Indonesian-African American, sir. It's all I know.
Statistics: Posted by Demon — December 17th, 2011, 9:58 am
]]>
]]>
bluecoat wrote:
There's a provision in the bill that it doesn't apply to citizens; only to illegals. There's no danger of thought police.
It's not the thought police now, it's really racist police! Hooray!
1. The provision only states that in that section.
2. Nobody said anything about race. As far as I'm concerned, the race card needs to die.
Statistics: Posted by Snake1235 — December 16th, 2011, 5:30 pm
]]>
There's a provision in the bill that it doesn't apply to citizens; only to illegals. There's no danger of thought police.
It's not the thought police now, it's really racist police! Hooray!
Statistics: Posted by Jdude73 — December 16th, 2011, 4:44 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
Well, at least if you're not a terrorist when they file the papers. They don't have to prove anything to get rid of you now.
This is absurd. Depending on how well Ron Paul does in the primaries, I may end up voting for him for the Presidency, with everything else Libertarian. Otherwise, I'll vote everything Libertarian.
Statistics: Posted by Snake1235 — December 16th, 2011, 2:29 am
]]>
What everyone is up in arms about is the key word above. "Suspected" means no right to an attorney, no right to remain silent, no right for a trial even, etc...
Statistics: Posted by Spirographed — December 16th, 2011, 2:15 am
]]>
Obama has stated that he's not going to veto it.
Yep, officially Ron Paul 2012 time.
Damn right. Unsure as to who the Republican candidate is gonna be, not that I'm keen on voting for them anyway given what happened with this bill. Certainly not voting for Obama. Ron Paul it is.
There was epic rage on facebook about this. Something about the government ignoring the wishes of our generation and catering to corporate lobbyists...though I don't see how they have a stake in this one.
it. I'm going to join the occupy movement and live a meaningful life as a dirty homeless man without direction. bluecoat wrote:
There's a provision in the bill that it doesn't apply to citizens; only to illegals.
If that's the case, then what is everyone up in arms about?
I was talking to my girlfriend about this, and she compared it to Guantanamo Bay. I told her, quite callously, that foreigners who commit crimes against the US (especially crimes of terror or subterfuge) have no rights under our constitution, as citizens do.
Again, I would have no problem with this bill if it simply read that citizens under suspicion would stand a fair trial. That's all. I'm all for stopping or deterring terrorism of any kind, but again. This bill is offensively unconstitutional.
Statistics: Posted by Landerpurex — December 16th, 2011, 2:03 am
]]>
Yep, officially Ron Paul 2012 time.
Statistics: Posted by Animal — December 15th, 2011, 8:31 pm
]]>
]]>
Welp. It passed. By by 1st Amend...hello Police State.
WOOOO!
Welcome home, big brother.
Statistics: Posted by Demon — December 15th, 2011, 3:45 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
Statistics: Posted by Snake1235 — December 6th, 2011, 7:26 pm
]]>
]]>
Shoot his testicles: Can't escape police if he's too busy worrying about this.
Tell him to turn around so you can shoot him without seeing the fear, then pop him in the buttocks: Forrest Gump reference opener.
Tell him to turn around so you can shoot him without seeing the fear, knock him out from behind: Guns are good bludgeons.
Go Hong Kong Phooey on him: Just make sure he's unarmed first.
Statistics: Posted by Kikori — December 6th, 2011, 11:45 am
]]>
]]>