Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_base has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 428

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_forum has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 844

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_topic has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 973
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
RuneVillage.com Where Gamers Escape! 2011-11-19T20:32:19-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/feed.php?f=16&t=436982 2011-11-19T20:32:19-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=436982&p=10298137#p10298137 <![CDATA[Re: Benetton's controversial ads - Why.]]>

Statistics: Posted by Market Man6 — November 19th, 2011, 8:32 pm


]]>
2011-11-19T19:59:40-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=436982&p=10298136#p10298136 <![CDATA[Re: Benetton's controversial ads - Why.]]>
But.

What.

No. Just no.

Statistics: Posted by Riptide — November 19th, 2011, 7:59 pm


]]>
2011-11-19T19:57:01-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=436982&p=10298135#p10298135 <![CDATA[Re: Benetton's controversial ads - Why.]]> Statistics: Posted by Spirographed — November 19th, 2011, 7:57 pm


]]>
2011-11-19T15:39:15-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=436982&p=10298119#p10298119 <![CDATA[Re: Benetton's controversial ads - Why.]]> Statistics: Posted by Eadwulf — November 19th, 2011, 3:39 pm


]]>
2011-11-19T03:01:59-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=436982&p=10298092#p10298092 <![CDATA[Re: Benetton's controversial ads - Why.]]> Market Man6 wrote:

Image


New Avatar.

Statistics: Posted by Godders — November 19th, 2011, 3:01 am


]]>
2011-11-18T21:44:19-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=436982&p=10298080#p10298080 <![CDATA[Re: Benetton's controversial ads - Why.]]>

Statistics: Posted by Market Man6 — November 18th, 2011, 9:44 pm


]]>
2011-11-18T16:26:42-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=436982&p=10298066#p10298066 <![CDATA[Benetton's controversial ads - Why.]]> Yahoo News - Controversial unhate ads

How is this effective in getting a point across. ._. Too open to interpretation.

Statistics: Posted by Demon — November 18th, 2011, 4:26 pm


]]>