iframe
Statistics: Posted by The123king — July 21st, 2017, 12:05 pm
]]>
Magicana Drofulcus wrote:
Magicana Drofulcus wrote:
Ic_Lb wrote:
I am glad that you are all laughing about this. That means that at least some of you read it.
When Kate cut and pasted it, she edited out a few things which should not have been taken out, making part of it impossible to understand. Those incomplete sentences and dangling phrases that don't make sense have been changed by her.
For the record NONE of this was pulled out of my hat. ALL of it is based on research over several years.
Does that mean that I am right? NO! Anyone can "research" something and twist it to what they WANT to believe.
Basically what Kate posted is the result of years of research. Are the conclusions I have drawn as a result of this research correct? I believe they are, but we will NOT know until after all of these dates have passed whether I am correct or just blowing hot air.
If anyone has POSITIVE PROOF that I am wrong in any detail, I will gladly correct those errors. Nothing will be changed without that proof.
But all of you might want to keep something in mind - He who laughs last laughs best. Until these dates have passed, you might not want to laugh too much. If I am correct (and NO one knows at this time, not even me), you will be choking on your laughter.
So, instead of laughing now, all of you might just want to mark the dates on your calendars so when the date comes and goes without anything happening, you can REALLY get a good laugh about this. At that time you can really get the last best laugh at my expense.
One last thing. I just posted another blog where Kate got this from. Anyone that wants another good laugh today might want to read it. But I expect to get the last laugh come the end of October this year.
When Kate cut and pasted it, she edited out a few things which should not have been taken out, making part of it impossible to understand. Those incomplete sentences and dangling phrases that don't make sense have been changed by her.
For the record NONE of this was pulled out of my hat. ALL of it is based on research over several years.
Does that mean that I am right? NO! Anyone can "research" something and twist it to what they WANT to believe.
Basically what Kate posted is the result of years of research. Are the conclusions I have drawn as a result of this research correct? I believe they are, but we will NOT know until after all of these dates have passed whether I am correct or just blowing hot air.
If anyone has POSITIVE PROOF that I am wrong in any detail, I will gladly correct those errors. Nothing will be changed without that proof.
But all of you might want to keep something in mind - He who laughs last laughs best. Until these dates have passed, you might not want to laugh too much. If I am correct (and NO one knows at this time, not even me), you will be choking on your laughter.
So, instead of laughing now, all of you might just want to mark the dates on your calendars so when the date comes and goes without anything happening, you can REALLY get a good laugh about this. At that time you can really get the last best laugh at my expense.
One last thing. I just posted another blog where Kate got this from. Anyone that wants another good laugh today might want to read it. But I expect to get the last laugh come the end of October this year.
Page bookmarked, Ill put all those dates into my phone and ill make sure to come onto this topic and laugh at you.
I bet you thought that I forgot to come back and laugh at you.
I never forget. I never sleep. I hunt. And I laugh.
Yeah I did, I only remembered at all because someone linked this in Discord. In my defence, I've changed like three computers/laptops since then.
Statistics: Posted by Magicana Drofulcus — February 19th, 2017, 4:55 am
]]>
Statistics: Posted by Eadwulf — February 19th, 2017, 3:08 am
]]>
Magicana Drofulcus wrote:
Ic_Lb wrote:
I am glad that you are all laughing about this. That means that at least some of you read it.
When Kate cut and pasted it, she edited out a few things which should not have been taken out, making part of it impossible to understand. Those incomplete sentences and dangling phrases that don't make sense have been changed by her.
For the record NONE of this was pulled out of my hat. ALL of it is based on research over several years.
Does that mean that I am right? NO! Anyone can "research" something and twist it to what they WANT to believe.
Basically what Kate posted is the result of years of research. Are the conclusions I have drawn as a result of this research correct? I believe they are, but we will NOT know until after all of these dates have passed whether I am correct or just blowing hot air.
If anyone has POSITIVE PROOF that I am wrong in any detail, I will gladly correct those errors. Nothing will be changed without that proof.
But all of you might want to keep something in mind - He who laughs last laughs best. Until these dates have passed, you might not want to laugh too much. If I am correct (and NO one knows at this time, not even me), you will be choking on your laughter.
So, instead of laughing now, all of you might just want to mark the dates on your calendars so when the date comes and goes without anything happening, you can REALLY get a good laugh about this. At that time you can really get the last best laugh at my expense.
One last thing. I just posted another blog where Kate got this from. Anyone that wants another good laugh today might want to read it. But I expect to get the last laugh come the end of October this year.
When Kate cut and pasted it, she edited out a few things which should not have been taken out, making part of it impossible to understand. Those incomplete sentences and dangling phrases that don't make sense have been changed by her.
For the record NONE of this was pulled out of my hat. ALL of it is based on research over several years.
Does that mean that I am right? NO! Anyone can "research" something and twist it to what they WANT to believe.
Basically what Kate posted is the result of years of research. Are the conclusions I have drawn as a result of this research correct? I believe they are, but we will NOT know until after all of these dates have passed whether I am correct or just blowing hot air.
If anyone has POSITIVE PROOF that I am wrong in any detail, I will gladly correct those errors. Nothing will be changed without that proof.
But all of you might want to keep something in mind - He who laughs last laughs best. Until these dates have passed, you might not want to laugh too much. If I am correct (and NO one knows at this time, not even me), you will be choking on your laughter.
So, instead of laughing now, all of you might just want to mark the dates on your calendars so when the date comes and goes without anything happening, you can REALLY get a good laugh about this. At that time you can really get the last best laugh at my expense.
One last thing. I just posted another blog where Kate got this from. Anyone that wants another good laugh today might want to read it. But I expect to get the last laugh come the end of October this year.
Page bookmarked, Ill put all those dates into my phone and ill make sure to come onto this topic and laugh at you.
I bet you thought that I forgot to come back and laugh at you.
I never forget. I never sleep. I hunt. And I laugh.
Statistics: Posted by Saten Ruiko — February 18th, 2017, 2:17 am
]]>
Ic_Lb wrote:
I am glad that you are all laughing about this. That means that at least some of you read it.
When Kate cut and pasted it, she edited out a few things which should not have been taken out, making part of it impossible to understand. Those incomplete sentences and dangling phrases that don't make sense have been changed by her.
For the record NONE of this was pulled out of my hat. ALL of it is based on research over several years.
Does that mean that I am right? NO! Anyone can "research" something and twist it to what they WANT to believe.
Basically what Kate posted is the result of years of research. Are the conclusions I have drawn as a result of this research correct? I believe they are, but we will NOT know until after all of these dates have passed whether I am correct or just blowing hot air.
If anyone has POSITIVE PROOF that I am wrong in any detail, I will gladly correct those errors. Nothing will be changed without that proof.
But all of you might want to keep something in mind - He who laughs last laughs best. Until these dates have passed, you might not want to laugh too much. If I am correct (and NO one knows at this time, not even me), you will be choking on your laughter.
So, instead of laughing now, all of you might just want to mark the dates on your calendars so when the date comes and goes without anything happening, you can REALLY get a good laugh about this. At that time you can really get the last best laugh at my expense.
One last thing. I just posted another blog where Kate got this from. Anyone that wants another good laugh today might want to read it. But I expect to get the last laugh come the end of October this year.
When Kate cut and pasted it, she edited out a few things which should not have been taken out, making part of it impossible to understand. Those incomplete sentences and dangling phrases that don't make sense have been changed by her.
For the record NONE of this was pulled out of my hat. ALL of it is based on research over several years.
Does that mean that I am right? NO! Anyone can "research" something and twist it to what they WANT to believe.
Basically what Kate posted is the result of years of research. Are the conclusions I have drawn as a result of this research correct? I believe they are, but we will NOT know until after all of these dates have passed whether I am correct or just blowing hot air.
If anyone has POSITIVE PROOF that I am wrong in any detail, I will gladly correct those errors. Nothing will be changed without that proof.
But all of you might want to keep something in mind - He who laughs last laughs best. Until these dates have passed, you might not want to laugh too much. If I am correct (and NO one knows at this time, not even me), you will be choking on your laughter.
So, instead of laughing now, all of you might just want to mark the dates on your calendars so when the date comes and goes without anything happening, you can REALLY get a good laugh about this. At that time you can really get the last best laugh at my expense.
One last thing. I just posted another blog where Kate got this from. Anyone that wants another good laugh today might want to read it. But I expect to get the last laugh come the end of October this year.
Page bookmarked, Ill put all those dates into my phone and ill make sure to come onto this topic and laugh at you.
I bet you thought that I forgot to come back and laugh at you.
I never forget. I never sleep. I hunt. And I laugh.
Statistics: Posted by Magicana Drofulcus — February 18th, 2017, 12:07 am
]]>
]]>
I'm not trying to be mean but if you bothered to actually read the Bible you would have seen this verse:
"But of that day and hour knows no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only." - Matthew 24:36.
Jesus is speaking of his second coming and specifically says that no one will know when that is except God himself. It is ok to speculate what events might happen and when and the Bible does say that we can know the "seasons" but when you start putting specific dates to specific events you just make yourself and the rest of us Christians look like idiots.
Snake owned.
Statistics: Posted by bartoron — October 1st, 2008, 3:09 pm
]]>
"But of that day and hour knows no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only." - Matthew 24:36.
Jesus is speaking of his second coming and specifically says that no one will know when that is except God himself. It is ok to speculate what events might happen and when and the Bible does say that we can know the "seasons" but when you start putting specific dates to specific events you just make yourself and the rest of us Christians look like idiots.
Statistics: Posted by Zilla — October 1st, 2008, 8:26 am
]]>
]]>
I'd read it.
Statistics: Posted by Topsummoner — September 30th, 2008, 4:43 pm
]]>
Statistics: Posted by Tweedy — September 30th, 2008, 1:22 pm
]]>
]]>
You fail.
Statistics: Posted by Magicana Drofulcus — September 29th, 2008, 9:47 pm
]]>
Watch as everything is laid out. As laid out above. When this happens, the very FACT that you were told AHEAD of time will ABSOLUTELY prove to you that the Bible is 100% accurate and THAT IT IS POSSIBLE to know the events and times AHEAD of time.
I'm surprised for something that you have labeled 'fact', there are still words like 'guess' and 'might' in your writing.
I'm all for trying to put pieces together to see if there's a link in the world ending I mean... here are 220 dates that world was (and is still) supposed to end: http://www.bible.ca/pre-date-setters.htm
All, of course related to the bible. (I don't know why it's so depressing..)
Anyways, I'm not Christian, so I guess I'm safe.
I like Buddhism, never any mention of the world going to end... it's peaceful, really.
Statistics: Posted by Hellfire — September 27th, 2008, 12:19 am
]]>
I see this with gamblers all the time. They win a few times in a row, and start doing the same thing over and over again. When they start losing, it's "oh it's past 4pm, I can't win after that" or something to make an excuse to bend it to suit their needs.
I don't believe in the numbers game, never have. Numbers can solve a LOT of problems but they, as far as I know, cannot predict future events (with exceptions that have a scientific backing i.e. hurricanes, weather changes, etc) like the end of the world, when I'll win the lotto (trust me, I tried!), or if my first child will be a boy or girl on August 21, 2011.
Statistics: Posted by Burks — September 10th, 2008, 10:55 am
]]>
-Matt
Statistics: Posted by Matt — September 10th, 2008, 7:41 am
]]>
The Book of Revelation was written at a time when the people then believed that Jesus was going to come back in the imminent future. Many parts of the Book are references to Roman or Jewish areas. Take, for example, Armageddon. The battle for the end of the world, or whatever. "Har Megido" is a plain in Turkey (could be wrong about that, but I know it was in the Roman Empire) where the Roman Army trained its fiercest and cruelest warriors. They were feared by all and if you met them in combat, you were just plain screwed. Think about it. "Har Megido" and "Armageddon." Most religious scholars believe that Armageddon referred to that plain. It was also at this plain where the Roman Army came together for the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. Later, the Roman Army was destroyed by other countries, one of the chief battles being at this plain on the top of a small hill. In other words, the Battle of Armageddon has probably already happened.
I'll go one step further to show you. 666/616 (depending on your source) has always been a source of mass debate when it comes to Revelation. Basically, the "number" refers to a popular name-game (bad choice of words, I know) in the first century AD. People would take their names and assign a number to each letter. Adding them up gave you a "number." The game was for people to use your number to figure out what your name would be. Fitting enough, Emperor Nero's number was, you guessed it, 666, and we all know what he did. As for 616? The Latin spelling of Nero's name adds up to 616 (the Greek version adds up to 666), but there may be another tie as well. Sometime in his four-year reign (37-41 AD), Roman Emperor Caligula erected a statue of himself in the Temple in Jerusalem. This is one of the biggest acts of blasphemy to God you can do, probably the worst next to denouncing His Authority. And his number? 616. Like the Battle of Armageddon, I'm willing to bet that 666/616 is old news.
Trivia: Caligula is Marc Antony's grandson.
To get a better idea of the name game I'm talking about...
Nero (Hebrew):
Resh - 200
Samekh - 60
Qoph - 100
Nun - 50
Vuv - 6
Resh - 200
Nun - 50
Total - 666
Nero (Hebrew translation from Latin):
Resh - 200
Samekh - 60
Qoph - 100
Vuv - 6
Resh - 200
Nun - 50
Total - 616
Caligula (Hebrew):
Resh - 200
Samekh - 60
Qoph - 100
Samekh - 60
Gimel - 3
Lamed - 30
Qoph - 100
Samekh - 60
Gimel - 3
Total - 616
Caligula (Greek):
Γ - 3
α - 1
ι - 10
ο - 70
σς -200
Κ - 20
α - 1
ι - 10
σς - 200
α ρ - 1
Total - 616
And besides, have you thought of the other Apocalypse predictions mentioned in the Bible? Ezra II (if you're Protestant, look in the Apocrypha)? Genesis accounts and references after the Flood? There's a lot more than just Revelation. You also really failed to dig deep into the Revelation and the Apocryphic writings. Where are the connections to the Angels and the Seals? How do the Four Horsemen tie into this? Has there been a significant event in the recent past that could relate to any of this?
Have you read Joel? Isaiah? Micah? Their writings provide a less grim picture than nations warring against each other. Where are your connections to this?
Now to go into all the dates and numbers that you went into. Yes, the Lunar Calender is a very important aspect of every ancient religious culture, but just because one day falls on another significant date in history doesn't mean anything. Going by your logic, Americans should expect Alaska to break way from the United States on July 2nd and make their own Declaration on the 4th.
1260 days? What's the purpose of these numbers? I can't find my Bible, but I can't think of any specific reference to the number 1260. Same goes with 1290 and 1335.
On May 12, 2012, your timeline says that the Rapture of the Saints will occur on Pentecost. Unless I misread you, it seems like you said that this event IS Pentecost. Well, it isn't. It's basically the Christian version of the Jewish feist shavout (Jewish members please correct my spelling). So, yeah. If this date is the Rapture of the Saints, then what about Satan's army? Are you talking about the Muslim countries? Oh Lord...
Muslims and Christians are not going to war against each other anytime soon. The reason that fundamentalist Muslim states in the Middle East do not like the Western countries is because those countries are secular. Catholicism/Protestantism/Orthodox and Islam has nothing to do with it. Islam and Christianity are people of the same book; Islam has another prophet.
Also, what is with all of these predictions? What goes into this? What's your proof that something happens? At least reference something in the past that shows how this all leads up to each other. You really don't have any proof that any of this will happen, and if you do, please share it with us. I think we can take it.
And don't say "Check your Bible."
Statistics: Posted by Blackmage172 — August 30th, 2008, 6:40 pm
]]>
]]>
A second GUESS is that this is the day that the Pope will move to Jerusalem to "keep the peace" between the Jews, the Christians, and the Muslims.
So first off being a previously strong roman catholic I distinctly remember something in the doctrines about the pope isn't to leave Vatican city and establish a permanent residence anywhere else. Like I said in my earlier post this whole thing is without any glue of any sort to hold the pieces of dribble onto the screen. So basically you asked us if there is any proof to deny this any way I implore you to do the same.
I really want to know where your proof is.
Statistics: Posted by MiKeBoY2003 — August 29th, 2008, 8:27 pm
]]>
Grass is green.
bart's sig contains a shred of green.
Therefor his sig must be made of grass.
In addition, the Middle Eastern Coalition in Battlefield has a green flag, therefor they must have grass and be in bart's sig.
It is solved then! The MEC will jump out of bart's sig and start smoking everyone in grass so they will be unable to fight back.
I am doing the exact same as you did here, thorough research on something made by someone else a while ago.
Statistics: Posted by Judge — August 27th, 2008, 11:23 am
]]>