Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_base has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 428

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_forum has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 844

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_topic has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 973
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
RuneVillage.com Where Gamers Escape! 2010-07-25T07:34:45-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/feed.php?f=12&t=432776 2010-07-25T07:34:45-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10237786#p10237786 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]>
Greetings,
Glodenox

Statistics: Posted by Glodenox — July 25th, 2010, 7:34 am


]]>
2010-07-25T06:29:41-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10237780#p10237780 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Hideyoshi wrote:

Goten wrote:
Henner wrote:
Tbh, I didnt notice the difference. :|

Should we have a global poll?
I think that's a good idea. Couldn't hurt anything.


Yes it could. People might choose the option I don't want :;_;:

Please tell me which one it is so I can vote for it.

(Yeah, a global poll sounds fair. I like more posts per page personally though.)

Statistics: Posted by Tweedy — July 25th, 2010, 6:29 am


]]>
2010-07-25T06:26:30-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10237779#p10237779 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Goten wrote:

Henner wrote:
Tbh, I didnt notice the difference. :|

Should we have a global poll?
I think that's a good idea. Couldn't hurt anything.


Yes it could. People might choose the option I don't want :;_;:

Statistics: Posted by Pyro3000 — July 25th, 2010, 6:26 am


]]>
2010-07-25T06:24:04-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10237777#p10237777 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Henner wrote:

Tbh, I didnt notice the difference. :|

Should we have a global poll?
I think that's a good idea. Couldn't hurt anything.

Statistics: Posted by Christopher — July 25th, 2010, 6:24 am


]]>
2010-07-24T08:48:51-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10237509#p10237509 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]>
Glodenox wrote:

I'm afraid that those settings are board-wide and therefore not easily adjustable for each user separately. I'm convinced at least somebody will have made a mod to adjust this behaviour, but this isn't just something we can change in the control panels, I'm afraid.

Greetings,
Glodenox

So it is possible, because some people made modifications for this, but I'd really like to tone down the amount of modifications made on the forums. I still vividly remember what a pain it was to upgrade the board from 3.0.4 to 3.0.6...

Greetings,
Glodenox

Statistics: Posted by Glodenox — July 24th, 2010, 8:48 am


]]>
2010-07-23T20:56:20-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10237421#p10237421 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]>
It doesn't always have to be one size fits all.

Statistics: Posted by Donut Juice — July 23rd, 2010, 8:56 pm


]]>
2010-07-21T14:34:00-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10236958#p10236958 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Statistics: Posted by Riptide — July 21st, 2010, 2:34 pm


]]>
2010-07-21T13:29:33-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10236948#p10236948 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Riptide wrote:

TBH, I'd like more on some topics, less in others


What.

I don't think you understand how this works.

~DC1

Statistics: Posted by twinArmageddons — July 21st, 2010, 1:29 pm


]]>
2010-07-21T07:25:10-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10236878#p10236878 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Statistics: Posted by Riptide — July 21st, 2010, 7:25 am


]]>
2010-07-21T04:10:39-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10236867#p10236867 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Henner wrote:

Tbh, I didnt notice the difference. :|

Should we have a global poll?


How about being able to personalize the about we see in a page? Personally 20 is good enough for me however, some prefer less or even more then that.

That is if it's not to bothersome.

Statistics: Posted by Gui — July 21st, 2010, 4:10 am


]]>
2010-07-20T22:22:38-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10236834#p10236834 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]>

Should we have a global poll?

Statistics: Posted by Henner — July 20th, 2010, 10:22 pm


]]>
2010-07-20T15:27:30-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10236755#p10236755 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Goten wrote:

I would like it to go back to 15 per page. The pages seem too long to me now, I get uninterested in reading all the responses.

LOADING A NEW PAGE REFRESHES MY INTEREST.
This is my point of view as well. 8-[ For some reason 20-page topics seem like much more of an ordeal now than a 27-page topic would have otherwise back then.

Statistics: Posted by Saten Ruiko — July 20th, 2010, 3:27 pm


]]>
2010-07-20T10:02:05-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10236696#p10236696 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Tanksandguns wrote:

Gui wrote:
Tanksandguns wrote:


We commonplace folk can't read that.

Basically what it says, is that it's Henner's fault.

N

Statistics: Posted by Henner — July 20th, 2010, 10:02 am


]]>
2010-07-19T18:31:14-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10236594#p10236594 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]>
LOADING A NEW PAGE REFRESHES MY INTEREST.

Statistics: Posted by Christopher — July 19th, 2010, 6:31 pm


]]>
2010-07-15T16:51:29-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10235979#p10235979 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Gui wrote:

Tanksandguns wrote:


We commonplace folk can't read that.

Basically what it says, is that it's Henner's fault.

Statistics: Posted by Tanksandguns — July 15th, 2010, 4:51 pm


]]>
2010-07-15T16:14:48-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10235963#p10235963 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Hideyoshi wrote:

Jackstick wrote:
It looks like it was an unintentional and unexplainable change. It was brought up in one of the staff forums, about half of the people who posted prefer the the 20 post per page, while the other half would like to go back to 15. So... yeeeah.


Which means half of the people in that thread are stupid.

I still wish we could set our own limit.

Statistics: Posted by Animal — July 15th, 2010, 4:14 pm


]]>
2010-07-13T03:18:06-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10235512#p10235512 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Jackstick wrote:

It looks like it was an unintentional and unexplainable change. It was brought up in one of the staff forums, about half of the people who posted prefer the the 20 post per page, while the other half would like to go back to 15. So... yeeeah.


Which means half of the people in that thread are stupid.

I still wish we could set our own limit.

Statistics: Posted by Pyro3000 — July 13th, 2010, 3:18 am


]]>
2010-07-13T02:00:56-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10235506#p10235506 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]>
I usually choose the 50 per page option on other websites.

Statistics: Posted by Muscular Ape — July 13th, 2010, 2:00 am


]]>
2010-07-13T01:22:36-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10235502#p10235502 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> Tanksandguns wrote:

We commonplace folk can't read that.

Statistics: Posted by Gui — July 13th, 2010, 1:22 am


]]>
2010-07-12T19:49:33-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=432776&p=10235420#p10235420 <![CDATA[Re: Posts per page increased?]]> But I like this a lot better.

Statistics: Posted by Riptide — July 12th, 2010, 7:49 pm


]]>