RuneVillage.com

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-27T14:15:48-06:00

Only bad things can come from this update, unless there's a party ofcourse.

Statistics: Posted by Godders — February 27th, 2010, 2:15 pm

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-14T11:13:44-06:00

lol

Statistics: Posted by Ultragast — February 14th, 2010, 11:13 am

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-14T11:13:26-06:00

One word responses are allowed now?

Statistics: Posted by Ultragast — February 14th, 2010, 11:13 am

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-10T15:34:29-06:00

Topsummoner wrote:

Edit: Crap read it wrong

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!

Statistics: Posted by Tanksandguns — February 10th, 2010, 3:34 pm

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-10T04:52:16-06:00

Henners a loooser..

oh, i mean yay thanks for updating!

Statistics: Posted by Erica — February 10th, 2010, 4:52 am

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-09T19:46:02-06:00

Rules wrote:

Spam includes nothing but replying to Jackstick's cries for help with Frank.

Fixd.

Statistics: Posted by Riptide — February 9th, 2010, 7:46 pm

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-09T16:48:28-06:00

Matt258 wrote:

rockrocks wrote:

Thanks Guys, this is a greatHORRIBLE update .

Fixed

Agreed.

I better add another sentence to make sure I'm not breaking da rules.

Edit: Crap read it wrong

Statistics: Posted by Topsummoner — February 9th, 2010, 4:48 pm

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-09T13:39:02-06:00

rockrocks wrote:

Thanks Guys, this is a greatHORRIBLE update .

Fixed

Statistics: Posted by Matt258 — February 9th, 2010, 1:39 pm

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-08T10:44:18-06:00

Thanks Guys, this is a great update .

Statistics: Posted by rockrocks — February 8th, 2010, 10:44 am

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-08T09:12:12-06:00

Mogo wrote:

Be prepared for Frank 5.6!!! That's when we're in trouble

Only Jackstick is in trouble when Frank reaches 5.0. Get the prophecy right.

Statistics: Posted by Snake1235 — February 8th, 2010, 9:12 am

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-08T08:16:02-06:00

Be prepared for Frank 5.6!!! That's when we're in trouble

Statistics: Posted by Mogo — February 8th, 2010, 8:16 am

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-08T08:09:07-06:00

Frank 4.0.1 wrote:

So this is the anti-Frank rule? I'll let you all know right now I have no plans to stop posting here! My stupid and pointless messages will be heard!

Dammit, he's on to us...

Statistics: Posted by Jackstick — February 8th, 2010, 8:09 am

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-08T03:45:27-06:00

It impressive the amount of spam that appeas in topics like this

Statistics: Posted by Mogo — February 8th, 2010, 3:45 am

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-08T03:10:39-06:00

So this is the anti-Frank rule? I'll let you all know right now I have no plans to stop posting here! My stupid and pointless messages will be heard!

Statistics: Posted by Frank 4.0.1 — February 8th, 2010, 3:10 am

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-08T00:16:28-06:00

I like it, it goes into more detail, and it's more clear on what our definition of spam is.

Statistics: Posted by Rory — February 8th, 2010, 12:16 am

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-07T23:21:30-06:00

So... What you're saying is...

~~~

...Double posts are allowed?

[Roddy] Nooooot precisely.
(Merged those for ya. ;) -Jaron

Statistics: Posted by Snake1235 — February 7th, 2010, 11:21 pm

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-07T22:56:35-06:00

Nice.

Statistics: Posted by Animal — February 7th, 2010, 10:56 pm

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-07T17:45:51-06:00

I'm riking it

Statistics: Posted by Pyro3000 — February 7th, 2010, 5:45 pm

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-07T16:06:26-06:00

Terrific! Limitations that did no harm were silly.

Statistics: Posted by Donut Juice — February 7th, 2010, 4:06 pm

Re: The spam rule has changed

2010-02-07T14:32:37-06:00

Statistics: Posted by Tanksandguns — February 7th, 2010, 2:32 pm