Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_base has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 428

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_forum has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 844

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_topic has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 973
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
RuneVillage.com Where Gamers Escape! 2009-10-20T11:38:02-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/feed.php?f=12&t=429522 2009-10-20T11:38:02-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3539606#p3539606 <![CDATA[Re: The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]> Faz wrote:

And the sigs we made weren't half bad either ;)

Haha, definitely! :^_^: I can't even imagine the work that went into some of them, and they no doubt would have done well regardless of the number of people.

I'm merely saying to the people doubting their chances; the only time you have no chance of winning is when you don't enter at all.

Statistics: Posted by Whydidijoin — October 20th, 2009, 11:38 am


]]>
2009-10-20T09:11:53-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3539587#p3539587 <![CDATA[Re: The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]> Whydidijoin wrote:

And that small group of people who were dedicated and entered every week didn't have nearly the competition that they could have had, and they were able to place on a more consistent basis.


And the sigs we made weren't half bad either ;)

Statistics: Posted by Faz — October 20th, 2009, 9:11 am


]]>
2009-10-20T08:49:32-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3539581#p3539581 <![CDATA[Re: The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]> Faz wrote:

Ghoultrue wrote:
Meh, it's all a popularity contest in my opinion. I won't even bother with it.

New judges pal

And for the record, it was never a popularity contest. Some judges occasionally voted for creativity and humour ahead of pure skill (which isn't necessarily a bad thing), and that pushed what you may call arguable placings into 2nd and 3rd place on rare occasions. But even if you disagree with the way it was voted on, the least of reasons was a popularity contest.

In fact, one of the main reasons a same group of people placed so often was because of people like you saying "Oh, I won't win.. I'm not good enough/I don't like the way it's voted/whatever". They didn't enter, and they never won. And that small group of people who were dedicated and entered every week didn't have nearly the competition that they could have had, and they were able to place on a more consistent basis.

Statistics: Posted by Whydidijoin — October 20th, 2009, 8:49 am


]]>
2009-10-20T04:04:07-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3539544#p3539544 <![CDATA[Re: The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]>
Hey hows it going? ^_^ good to see that its back finnaly :P

Statistics: Posted by Erica — October 20th, 2009, 4:04 am


]]>
2009-10-20T02:10:44-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3539536#p3539536 <![CDATA[Re: The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]> Ghoultrue wrote:

Meh, it's all a popularity contest in my opinion. I won't even bother with it.


New judges pal

Statistics: Posted by Faz — October 20th, 2009, 2:10 am


]]>
2009-10-17T15:56:42-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3538569#p3538569 <![CDATA[Re: The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]> Noen wrote:

Ghoultrue wrote:
Meh, it's all a popularity contest in my opinion. I won't even bother with it.


I highly doubt this is true..


Yeah, it's not. :?:

Wouldn't hurt to enter anyway, Ventrue. I'm sure you have plenty of nice sigs lying around. :D

Statistics: Posted by Jackstick — October 17th, 2009, 3:56 pm


]]>
2009-10-17T15:51:22-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3538565#p3538565 <![CDATA[Re: The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]> Ghoultrue wrote:

Meh, it's all a popularity contest in my opinion. I won't even bother with it.


I highly doubt this is true..

Statistics: Posted by Nish — October 17th, 2009, 3:51 pm


]]>
2009-10-17T13:33:16-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3538518#p3538518 <![CDATA[Re: The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]> Statistics: Posted by Ventrue — October 17th, 2009, 1:33 pm


]]>
2009-10-16T17:51:07-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3538330#p3538330 <![CDATA[Re: The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]>
I'm gonna try and probably won't win. :laugh:

Statistics: Posted by Animal — October 16th, 2009, 5:51 pm


]]>
2009-10-16T16:13:18-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3538296#p3538296 <![CDATA[Re: The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]> Statistics: Posted by Nish — October 16th, 2009, 4:13 pm


]]>
2009-10-16T13:52:29-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3538251#p3538251 <![CDATA[Re: The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]>

Best of luck everyone!

Statistics: Posted by Whydidijoin — October 16th, 2009, 1:52 pm


]]>
2009-10-15T18:17:07-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=429522&p=3537939#p3537939 <![CDATA[The Righteous Return of the Greatest Competition Ever]]>
From now on, the newly refurbished Signature of the Month competition will run from the 15th of every month to the 10th of the next month, with about week in between for the judges to contemplate the radically beautiful entries submitted over the three previous weeks.

For those wondering how we plan on keeping a SoTM global up all the time, fret not. We have decided that having such a global up all the time would be rather silly, and that instead we will have the topic set up as an announcement in General Pictures from the 15th to the 3rd, and then as a global from the 3rd to the 10th so that people know to get their entries in.

For those wondering, here are a couple of links that might be helpful in getting familiar with the new SoTM competition. First, Steely Mallon has graciously compiled a list of websites that may be helpful in learning about graphic design programs, tutorials in the various programs, and other such tidbits of useful information that can be found here. Second, everyone planning on entering a SoTM should familiarize themselves with the rules of the competition, which can be found in all SotM topics. You wouldn't want to enter a beautiful piece of work just to have it turned away because the filesize was too large. And third, the Winner's Thread, which catalogs all the previous winners of SoTM and SoTW competitions, can be found here.

Finally, we would like to thank you for being so patient in waiting for the return of this spectacular competition. We know many mourned the loss of the SoTW back in 2008, so we're all quite excited to see how this new and improved SoTM plays out.

Signature of the Month #1!

Jackstick and Rocky Martin
SoTM Managers

Statistics: Posted by Rocky — October 15th, 2009, 6:17 pm


]]>