I had about 4.2k or something. Definitely over 4k though
Statistics: Posted by Saten Ruiko — October 18th, 2009, 12:01 am
]]>
]]>
edwardlover172 wrote:
I have no idea what mine was 
Somewhere around 6000 I think.
I finally found one with 6078 in mid-August, and in addition to what you've posted recently, it came to around +950. It was really tough though--all of the caches now are of the CURRENT site, with the rollbacked post counts. Somewhere around 6000 I think.This means it's pretty much a final warning, people! If you haven't gotten your post count reset to what it was in August, post here as soon as you can, because time is running out and fast!
Thanks!
Statistics: Posted by Blackmage172 — October 7th, 2009, 10:37 am
]]>
I have no idea what mine was
Somewhere around 6000 I think.This means it's pretty much a final warning, people! If you haven't gotten your post count reset to what it was in August, post here as soon as you can, because time is running out and fast!
Statistics: Posted by Saten Ruiko — October 6th, 2009, 8:28 pm
]]>
Statistics: Posted by Blackmage172 — October 6th, 2009, 1:28 pm
]]>
I had around 2800, I think
I found 2091 in the middle of August 2009. If you can find anything higher (or closer to 2800), feel free to let me know.
-Jaronwoopsie, I was thinking of my post count somewhere else
Statistics: Posted by Nate — September 28th, 2009, 2:34 pm
]]>
Moose out
Statistics: Posted by Mogo — September 26th, 2009, 5:15 pm
]]>
Something you guys may want to think about: Yes, a date closer to the end of August 2009 means your post count is more accurate...but if all you can find is something from February 2009, then don't assume that's it. I've found some much higher post counts from an October 2007 post than a February 2009 post. You're not looking for when the post was made, but rather, when Google cached it. (But of course, anything early-to-mid-August will always be the most accurate.)
Garth wrote:
Hey, whoever deleted my post I was serious. I was in the 1330's. :C
" post that was a page back? I found that via Google, too.Statistics: Posted by Saten Ruiko — September 26th, 2009, 3:28 pm
]]>
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:as ... clnk&gl=us
Statistics: Posted by Eadwulf — September 26th, 2009, 6:39 am
]]>
Wow, maybe a few more O.o http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:5F ... en&ct=clnk
Statistics: Posted by Mogo — September 26th, 2009, 6:23 am
]]>
I found 2091 in the middle of August 2009. If you can find anything higher (or closer to 2800), feel free to let me know.
-JaronStatistics: Posted by Nate — September 25th, 2009, 3:50 pm
]]>
Anyone mind checking mine if they can? <3
Just cause you're British.
mogomongoose: 9328
http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:ZP ... clnk&gl=us
Statistics: Posted by J@nr0k — September 23rd, 2009, 2:27 pm
]]>
August 21st-11663-Svstoned.
Thanks
Statistics: Posted by svstoned — September 23rd, 2009, 1:44 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
No idea, didnt even know that post count could be restored, i do know that over the past few years i have lost over 5k of them...
Could someone check the cache for me because i dont know how
And restore my postcount to what it used to be before the recent rollback?
Thanks in advance
Statistics: Posted by svstoned — September 23rd, 2009, 7:28 am
]]>
]]>
Statistics: Posted by svstoned — September 22nd, 2009, 7:10 am
]]>
I think my post count was somewhere around 370-something I think (I know it was over 350 and under 400, or I could be totally off, I don't keep track ^^;), I'm not sure for sure, and don't really care that much. But, updating it would be nice.
Statistics: Posted by Rayseima — September 21st, 2009, 11:09 pm
]]>
Nathan wrote:
I just realized I had about 6600 posts.. I'm not sure of the number.
Cache from Aug 27 showed 6524 posts, and you've made 46 posts since the forums came back up, so I set you to 6570 posts. :3
Sounds good to me.. I knew I was close. lol
Statistics: Posted by Frogger — September 20th, 2009, 1:58 pm
]]>