Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_base has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 428
Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_forum has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 844
Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_topic has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 973 [phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428) [phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428) [phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428) [phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428) [phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428) RuneVillage.comWhere Gamers Escape!2008-07-19T12:32:25-06:00http://poorshark.com/ThePub/feed.php?f=12&t=4258402008-07-19T12:32:25-06:00http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425840&p=3480066#p3480066 I couldn't find it.
So I just manually changed the font-size for the quick reply to something smaller. The font is the same as the Post Reply textarea, and it really looks weird when you use the same font as our posts (I tried it, it's very weird to see).
- Greetz Glodenox
Statistics: Posted by Glodenox — July 19th, 2008, 12:32 pm
Any chance of the font being the same as the rest of RV instead of arial?
I agree; smaller, too. If the Quick Reply box is going to be that big, then we should be able to at least see what we're typing.
Statistics: Posted by Saten Ruiko — July 19th, 2008, 10:44 am
]]>2008-07-19T09:02:16-06:00http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425840&p=3480009#p3480009Statistics: Posted by Halley92 — July 19th, 2008, 9:02 am
]]>2008-07-14T22:14:32-06:00http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425840&p=3478284#p3478284Statistics: Posted by Mackerel — July 14th, 2008, 10:14 pm
]]>2008-07-14T11:58:42-06:00http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425840&p=3478063#p3478063 With the current way it's shown, it's of no use to have it collapsed at first. That would take away a huge part of the advantage of having a Quick Reply.
- Greetz Glodenox
Statistics: Posted by Glodenox — July 14th, 2008, 11:58 am
]]>2008-07-14T10:38:25-06:00http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425840&p=3478034#p3478034Statistics: Posted by Dark Paladin — July 14th, 2008, 10:38 am
]]>2008-07-14T06:52:11-06:00http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425840&p=3477947#p3477947 This view won a poll
Statistics: Posted by reggie — July 14th, 2008, 6:52 am
]]>2008-07-14T06:43:43-06:00http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425840&p=3477942#p3477942Statistics: Posted by Mackerel — July 14th, 2008, 6:43 am
]]>