Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_base has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 428

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_forum has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 844

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_topic has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 973
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
RuneVillage.com Where Gamers Escape! 2008-07-09T15:33:55-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/feed.php?f=12&t=425670 2008-07-09T15:33:55-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475801#p3475801 <![CDATA[Re: So]]>
Kikori, like Sarah stated, you should know better than to post something like that.

Statistics: Posted by A5chow — July 9th, 2008, 3:33 pm


]]>
2008-07-09T04:12:11-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475553#p3475553 <![CDATA[Re: So]]> Statistics: Posted by Jackstick — July 9th, 2008, 4:12 am


]]>
2008-07-09T03:36:05-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475545#p3475545 <![CDATA[Re: So]]>
I can see no feasable reason for them having such an ability, if they wish a message to be sent to all in one usergroup they can contact someone with the ability, presumably the admins, to do so, as the rest of us users would presumably have to.

Yes this topic is here because a mistake was made, if the mistake wasn't made then we would not have been alerted to the issue, if we knew about it we would have probably complained before.

Kikori, as a mod you should know better than to flame-bait.

Statistics: Posted by Sarah — July 9th, 2008, 3:36 am


]]>
2008-07-09T02:21:51-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475537#p3475537 <![CDATA[Re: So]]> Kikori Crusher1 wrote:

*Looks at the people posting*

*Looks at their argument*

*Looks at the people posting again*

:lol:


Agreed.

Seriously why remove it? So ONE user made ONE mistake. He said he was sorry. Let's not make him the target of the other legends that use it properly. The last thing we need to do is make someone "the person that got it removed"

Statistics: Posted by Pyro3000 — July 9th, 2008, 2:21 am


]]>
2008-07-09T02:20:03-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475536#p3475536 <![CDATA[Re: So]]>
*Looks at their argument*

*Looks at the people posting again*

:lol:

Statistics: Posted by Kikori — July 9th, 2008, 2:20 am


]]>
2008-07-08T14:34:26-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475322#p3475322 <![CDATA[Re: So]]>
So if it was up to me, no changes would be made.

Also, there's no need to really ask for an administrative answer. You can always be sure there'll be one. When first looking through this topic I didn't deem it needed yet to answer, but I have now because I saw the need.

- Greetz Glodenox :cheese:

Statistics: Posted by Glodenox — July 8th, 2008, 2:34 pm


]]>
2008-07-08T14:28:59-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475319#p3475319 <![CDATA[Re: So]]> administrator answer please?

Statistics: Posted by Jem — July 8th, 2008, 2:28 pm


]]>
2008-07-08T14:21:03-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475315#p3475315 <![CDATA[Re: So]]>
And considering it's the first mishap... ever, I think you all can live if they continue to have the power.

Statistics: Posted by Donut Juice — July 8th, 2008, 2:21 pm


]]>
2008-07-08T13:58:30-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475308#p3475308 <![CDATA[Re: So]]> Richstar wrote:

staff can mass pm too :P


Ok. Lets kill two birds with one stone.

Whatevernumberpostthisis-ed

-Matt

Statistics: Posted by Matt — July 8th, 2008, 1:58 pm


]]>
2008-07-08T13:53:51-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475307#p3475307 <![CDATA[Re: So]]>

Statistics: Posted by Richboi — July 8th, 2008, 1:53 pm


]]>
2008-07-08T13:49:53-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475303#p3475303 <![CDATA[Re: So]]> Statistics: Posted by Ad — July 8th, 2008, 1:49 pm


]]>
2008-07-08T13:46:41-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475300#p3475300 <![CDATA[Re: So]]>

Statistics: Posted by Sarah — July 8th, 2008, 1:46 pm


]]>
2008-07-08T13:44:04-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475299#p3475299 <![CDATA[Re: So]]> Statistics: Posted by Frank 4.0.1 — July 8th, 2008, 1:44 pm


]]>
2008-07-08T13:42:41-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475298#p3475298 <![CDATA[Re: So]]> Statistics: Posted by Jem — July 8th, 2008, 1:42 pm


]]>
2008-07-08T13:41:44-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=425670&p=3475297#p3475297 <![CDATA[So]]>
Just before demonstrated how necessary they are, the whole forum lagged out because of it.

Remove ability to mass pm for legends '08.

Statistics: Posted by Mord — July 8th, 2008, 1:41 pm


]]>