Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_base has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 428

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_forum has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 844

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_topic has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 973
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
RuneVillage.com Where Gamers Escape! 2008-04-13T07:52:19-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/feed.php?f=12&t=422976 2008-04-13T07:52:19-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422976&p=3435040#p3435040 <![CDATA[Re: Ventilo Server]]> Statistics: Posted by Tokuman — April 13th, 2008, 7:52 am


]]>
2008-04-13T02:41:51-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422976&p=3434934#p3434934 <![CDATA[Re: Ventilo Server]]> Tokuman wrote:

Well, we were asked what would we like to see in RV. I think that we should think positively about the ideas. Think of ways they could be made successful. A lot of websites/clans have a vent server. I am not sure that it's possible, but I know for a fact it's not impossible.

Vent, along with other things could be something that could get the hype back to RV.


RHQ has one i know for a fact, but if we get one, it makes us look like we're copying RHQ, which is the total opposite of what's going on now:
Image

I think we should have something that only RV has. What that is, is beyond me, but i'm sure someone can think of something.

Statistics: Posted by The123king — April 13th, 2008, 2:41 am


]]>
2008-04-12T11:47:33-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422976&p=3434532#p3434532 <![CDATA[Re: Ventilo Server]]>
Vent, along with other things could be something that could get the hype back to RV.

Statistics: Posted by Tokuman — April 12th, 2008, 11:47 am


]]>
2008-04-11T22:23:38-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422976&p=3434237#p3434237 <![CDATA[Re: Ventilo Server]]> Statistics: Posted by A5chow — April 11th, 2008, 10:23 pm


]]>
2008-04-11T22:07:09-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422976&p=3434228#p3434228 <![CDATA[Re: Ventilo Server]]> Statistics: Posted by SanityCore — April 11th, 2008, 10:07 pm


]]>
2008-04-11T19:29:15-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422976&p=3434140#p3434140 <![CDATA[Re: Ventilo Server]]> Rat611 wrote:

People like talking, and thus would like talking over typing.
I personally much prefer typing to talking. That people like to talk isn't a simple given.

I personally don't think we need it. Most people that want to talk to other RVers already use Skype. Besides, it cannot be an official RuneVillage Ventrilo server unless we had enough to people to moderate it, which would be fairly difficult, I might think.

I'd advise just using Chat or Skype. :| Anything that's not entirely needed (or is already in use through Skype) probably isn't something Runevillage would pay money on.

Statistics: Posted by Saten Ruiko — April 11th, 2008, 7:29 pm


]]>
2008-04-11T17:36:10-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422976&p=3434090#p3434090 <![CDATA[Re: Ventilo Server]]>
The reason is that we already have a chatroom, although it is not a voice chatroom. Voice chatrooms would be a little harder to moderate, and may require a moderator to be present at all times, which is just not possible.

Statistics: Posted by Jackstick — April 11th, 2008, 5:36 pm


]]>
2008-04-11T17:35:12-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422976&p=3434088#p3434088 <![CDATA[Re: Ventilo Server]]>
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=419142 viewtopic.php?f=12&t=421197

For the reasons seen in those topic I don't support it.

Statistics: Posted by Mackerel — April 11th, 2008, 5:35 pm


]]>
2008-04-11T17:27:06-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422976&p=3434080#p3434080 <![CDATA[Ventilo Server]]>
Post to say if you support or not.


~Rat611~

Statistics: Posted by Rat King — April 11th, 2008, 5:27 pm


]]>