Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_base has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 428

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_forum has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 844

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_topic has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 973
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
RuneVillage.com Where Gamers Escape! 2008-04-11T16:47:24-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/feed.php?f=12&t=422882 2008-04-11T16:47:24-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422882&p=3434064#p3434064 <![CDATA[Re: Usergroups.]]>

"A No you have, a Yes you can get" is something people have always thought me.

- Greetz Glodenox :cheese:

Statistics: Posted by Glodenox — April 11th, 2008, 4:47 pm


]]>
2008-04-11T16:24:00-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422882&p=3434053#p3434053 <![CDATA[Re: Usergroups.]]>

Statistics: Posted by Draken~ — April 11th, 2008, 4:24 pm


]]>
2008-04-11T10:30:29-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422882&p=3433757#p3433757 <![CDATA[Re: Usergroups.]]> Tweedy wrote:

Well actually, the main reason for usergroups is that the admins (hiker especially) felt that they were distracting RV from what is its core purpose: to be an RS fansite. There was some concern that RV was becoming a free hosting site for everyone with 10 friends and a half-baked idea.



I would say that nearly half of the people at RV don't play Runescape anymore.

Statistics: Posted by Nate — April 11th, 2008, 10:30 am


]]>
2008-04-10T14:20:28-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422882&p=3433353#p3433353 <![CDATA[Re: Usergroups.]]> Statistics: Posted by Gamestar — April 10th, 2008, 2:20 pm


]]>
2008-04-10T06:39:45-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422882&p=3433188#p3433188 <![CDATA[Re: Usergroups.]]>
There was also the added problem that the 20 or so usergroups we had diluted activity into a myriad of hidden forums at the expense of the public ones. And of course the fact that many of the usergroups were inactive.

That's not to say that a usergroup won't be approved if there is a good idea that doesn't belong in any of the other categories, or is big enough to warrant its own usergroup (like the old GW, WoW usergroups, now public forums). But I'd have to say that CoD would slot perfectly into Other Games, as Mackerel said.

Statistics: Posted by Tweedy — April 10th, 2008, 6:39 am


]]>
2008-04-09T13:21:41-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422882&p=3432894#p3432894 <![CDATA[Re: Usergroups.]]> More Usergroups -> more forums -> more moderators -> less RL time Dx for them -> Chaos

Statistics: Posted by Dark Paladin — April 9th, 2008, 1:21 pm


]]>
2008-04-09T05:40:21-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422882&p=3432725#p3432725 <![CDATA[Re: Usergroups.]]>

Statistics: Posted by Nate — April 9th, 2008, 5:40 am


]]>
2008-04-09T01:29:16-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422882&p=3432640#p3432640 <![CDATA[Re: Usergroups.]]>

Statistics: Posted by Mackerel — April 9th, 2008, 1:29 am


]]>
2008-04-08T22:34:57-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422882&p=3432607#p3432607 <![CDATA[Re: Usergroups.]]> Draken~ wrote:

Is it possible to make more? Ive been wanting to make one for those that play Call of Duty 4. Reason why, is because i know that there are a lot of people at the village who have either xbox360, playstation 3, or PC version of this game of the year. :P I would like to know though if im allowed to create one, or if its even possible... Who would i go about asking?

Thanks a lot for the help. ^_^;


i haven't heard anything on the creation of new usergroups so i believe they are still frozen... but even if they weren't i doubt a call of duty 4 usergroup would be created as it can be discussed in the "Other Games" forum..

Statistics: Posted by plugy — April 8th, 2008, 10:34 pm


]]>
2008-04-08T19:56:35-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422882&p=3432548#p3432548 <![CDATA[Re: Usergroups.]]> Statistics: Posted by Arthenon — April 8th, 2008, 7:56 pm


]]>
2008-04-08T19:44:54-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422882&p=3432541#p3432541 <![CDATA[Usergroups.]]> I would like to know though if im allowed to create one, or if its even possible... Who would i go about asking?

Thanks a lot for the help. ^_^;

Statistics: Posted by Draken~ — April 8th, 2008, 7:44 pm


]]>