Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_base has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 428

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_forum has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 844

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_topic has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 973
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
RuneVillage.com Where Gamers Escape! 2008-04-28T02:43:46-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/feed.php?f=12&t=422405 2008-04-28T02:43:46-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3442023#p3442023 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]> If you read properly, I said i don't like it...

Statistics: Posted by Rory — April 28th, 2008, 2:43 am


]]>
2008-04-26T01:34:43-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3441186#p3441186 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]>

Statistics: Posted by Halley92 — April 26th, 2008, 1:34 am


]]>
2008-04-17T03:07:21-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3437244#p3437244 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]> I was just thinking, why can't it work like a spoiler?

Statistics: Posted by Rory — April 17th, 2008, 3:07 am


]]>
2008-04-15T13:57:57-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3436451#p3436451 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]>
We only put the most used, most basic smilies in that area. Putting them all in there would look unorganized. All you have to do is click view more smilies, and then click the smiley. It's no biggy.

Statistics: Posted by Jackstick — April 15th, 2008, 1:57 pm


]]>
2008-04-15T08:23:37-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3436271#p3436271 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]>

Statistics: Posted by Tokuman — April 15th, 2008, 8:23 am


]]>
2008-03-25T13:33:33-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3424957#p3424957 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]>
While we're on this topic, would it be possible to add several small smilies, that are identical to the size of our current ones? Goten had a few that were quite nice, maybe if he sees this he can post them.

Statistics: Posted by Donut Juice — March 25th, 2008, 1:33 pm


]]>
2008-03-25T09:21:58-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3424862#p3424862 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]> Jaron wrote:

I personally like it how it is. Like J@nr0k mentioned, there's less loading time when you don't have to put them all there. (Plus, I sort of like how people don't use the Hulk, Spam, and Plz Die smilies all the time. If they were easily accessible there, they'd probably start popping up everywhere...)

I don't think the loading time is a problem for those active posters as those images are IMMEDIATELY cached when you load them for the first time. Unless of course, you like clearing your cache after you stop browsing.

Statistics: Posted by Milo — March 25th, 2008, 9:21 am


]]>
2008-03-24T16:31:13-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3424604#p3424604 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]> H K wrote:

I think having more smilies added to the post reply screen would be a good idea. Except I think the big ugly ones like :ban: and :spam: Shouldn't be. Just add some smaller ones like :cheese:(Glode will be ever so happy) and :henner: (henner will be ever so happy).

Yeah I think the ones that are actually smilies (not: :spam: :lock: :die: :ban: ) can be added and won't ruin the shape.

I understand your point too guys, but a variety of smilies leads to more effective expressions.
Not liking the other smilies is not a good excuse lol. And memorizing the smilies is also not really an excuse.
I checked different resolutions and only the sides get less, but there is still space below.

If I look at my side it just looks so empty and I think it's really annoying to always click on the view more smilies.
Also, why display all font colours and only a few smilies?
I use other sites that display all smilies on the side and I did experience that it's much more useful and less irritating.
    ~Ethem

Statistics: Posted by Dark Paladin — March 24th, 2008, 4:31 pm


]]>
2008-03-24T16:28:44-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3424601#p3424601 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]>

Well, I personally don't really need any additional smilies to be available right away. All smilies that I ever intend to use are available on the left. And the cheese smilie I know by heart. It would take me four times longer to click at such an emoticon than just write it ;) I do have the space for it on the left, but I'm sure some people don't.

I highly doubt it will cause any significant lag due to loading the page, seeing it will be loaded from your cache. But it could indeed make the page load a bit longer because it has more work when building up the page.

- Greetz Glodenox :cheese:

Statistics: Posted by Glodenox — March 24th, 2008, 4:28 pm


]]>
2008-03-24T15:57:23-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3424584#p3424584 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]> and :spam: Shouldn't be. Just add some smaller ones like :cheese:(Glode will be ever so happy) and :henner: (henner will be ever so happy).

Statistics: Posted by H K — March 24th, 2008, 3:57 pm


]]>
2008-03-24T14:00:52-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3424530#p3424530 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]> Jaron wrote:

I personally like it how it is. Like J@nr0k mentioned, there's less loading time when you don't have to put them all there. (Plus, I sort of like how people don't use the Hulk, Spam, and Plz Die smilies all the time. If they were easily accessible there, they'd probably start popping up everywhere...)

:hulk: :spam: :die:

There isn't actually much space thre for me. You have to remember, things look different in different resolutions. not everyone runs everything in 4million x 3million. I, personally use 1024 x 756 and have quiute a crowded post-reply section as it is, and i wouldn't want every single smilie in front of me.

Statistics: Posted by The123king — March 24th, 2008, 2:00 pm


]]>
2008-03-24T10:54:08-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3424477#p3424477 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]> Statistics: Posted by Saten Ruiko — March 24th, 2008, 10:54 am


]]>
2008-03-23T19:17:20-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3424274#p3424274 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]> Statistics: Posted by Milo — March 23rd, 2008, 7:17 pm


]]>
2008-03-23T18:16:53-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3424262#p3424262 <![CDATA[Re: View more smilies]]>
Though thats just my opinion.

Statistics: Posted by J@nr0k — March 23rd, 2008, 6:16 pm


]]>
2008-03-23T17:19:18-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422405&p=3424244#p3424244 <![CDATA[View more smilies]]>
    ~Ethem
PS: check this:emoticons3.png

Statistics: Posted by Dark Paladin — March 23rd, 2008, 5:19 pm


]]>