Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_base has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 428

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_forum has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 844

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; phpbb_feed_topic has a deprecated constructor in /home/poorsh5/public_html/ThePub/feed.php on line 973
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/session.php on line 1024: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /feed.php:428)
RuneVillage.com Where Gamers Escape! 2008-03-24T06:15:52-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/feed.php?f=12&t=422323 2008-03-24T06:15:52-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422323&p=3424405#p3424405 <![CDATA[Re: 55kb]]> Milo wrote:

bartoron wrote:
If you can't get a good sig while staying under 55kb, then you don't know how to optimize an image to its full potential.

It's a fact.

I could say the same about the 36KB rule :)


Yes, I do somewhat agree with you on that. :-s

Statistics: Posted by bartoron — March 24th, 2008, 6:15 am


]]>
2008-03-23T14:29:47-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422323&p=3424211#p3424211 <![CDATA[Re: 55kb]]> bartoron wrote:

If you can't get a good sig while staying under 55kb, then you don't know how to optimize an image to its full potential.

It's a fact.

I could say the same about the 36KB rule :)

Statistics: Posted by Milo — March 23rd, 2008, 2:29 pm


]]>
2008-03-22T12:41:11-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422323&p=3423720#p3423720 <![CDATA[Re: 55kb]]>
It's a fact.

Statistics: Posted by bartoron — March 22nd, 2008, 12:41 pm


]]>
2008-03-22T10:01:09-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422323&p=3423664#p3423664 <![CDATA[Re: 55kb]]> plugy wrote:

the limit has been increased? when did this happen? thats insatiable...where am i?

After a discussion hiker decided to change it from the former 36KB to the current 55KB.

http://runevillage.com/ThePub/viewtopic ... 4&t=417351

Statistics: Posted by Donut Juice — March 22nd, 2008, 10:01 am


]]>
2008-03-22T09:57:42-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422323&p=3423663#p3423663 <![CDATA[Re: 55kb]]> Statistics: Posted by plugy — March 22nd, 2008, 9:57 am


]]>
2008-03-20T16:21:53-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422323&p=3423006#p3423006 <![CDATA[Re: 55kb]]>
If you happen to find somebody breaking this 55kB rule, please feel free to report them to a Forum Moderator, Board Moderator or Forum Administrator, but I doubt you'll find many people breaking this rule.

Since this is more or less a complaint towards the administration, I'm going to move it to Hiker's Campfire where we can discuss this better :)

Can you please post the avatar and signature you were using? I'm sure I'll be able to lower it in file size for you so they'll fit nicely within the limit :) If you want me to, I can even add the avatar and signature for you myself, unless you don't want to have me fiddling with your avatar and signature space of course.

- Greetz Glodenox :cheese:

Statistics: Posted by Glodenox — March 20th, 2008, 4:21 pm


]]>
2008-03-20T16:17:26-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422323&p=3423002#p3423002 <![CDATA[Re: 55kb]]>
Ranting like this will get you nowhere.

Statistics: Posted by Halley92 — March 20th, 2008, 4:17 pm


]]>
2008-03-20T14:18:53-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422323&p=3422974#p3422974 <![CDATA[Re: 55kb]]>
Second of all the max size for a Signature on RV is 55Kb. Don't complain the max used to be 36. There are some users that have a signature higher than the 55Kb limit and the Moderators are trying to get them to downsize their signatures. And no, not nearly everyone has one over 55Kb.

And by moose do you mean Mogomongoose?

Statistics: Posted by Pupsin — March 20th, 2008, 2:18 pm


]]>
2008-03-20T09:58:42-06:00 http://poorshark.com/ThePub/viewtopic.php?t=422323&p=3422890#p3422890 <![CDATA[55kb]]> Statistics: Posted by pig^raptor — March 20th, 2008, 9:58 am


]]>